...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and Drug Law Journal >An Analysis of 'Natural' Food Litigation to Build a Sesame Allergy Consumer Class Action
【24h】

An Analysis of 'Natural' Food Litigation to Build a Sesame Allergy Consumer Class Action

机译:“自然”食品诉讼分析,以建立芝麻过敏消费类课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a world where food allergy is still an incurable disease, law and regulation stand as necessary mechanisms to provide food-allergic consumers with the information they need to protect their health. The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 provided specific labeling requirements for the "Top Eight" allergens in the U.S.: milk, soy, gluten, egg, tree nut, peanut, fish, and Crustacean shellfish. Since then, sesame has become more prevalent as an allergen and remains just as dangerous, inducing anaphylactic shock in some sesame-allergic individuals. Yet sesame remains unregulated, despite advocates and congressional members arguing for its inclusion.
机译:在一个食物过敏症仍然是一种无法治愈的疾病,法律和监管中,作为必要的机制,为食物过敏的消费者提供保护他们的健康所需的信息。 2004年食品过敏原标签和消费者保护法案为美国的“前八”过敏原提供了特定的标签要求.:牛奶,大豆,麸质,鸡蛋,树坚果,花生,鱼和甲壳类动物。 从那时起,芝麻变得更普遍,作为过敏原,仍然是危险的,诱导一些芝麻过敏性质的过敏性休克。 尽管倡导者和国会成员争论其包含,但芝麻仍然是不受管制的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号