首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand =: Chotmaihet thangphaet >Comparison of effective-site target controlled infusion and manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during spinal anesthesia.
【24h】

Comparison of effective-site target controlled infusion and manually controlled infusion of propofol for sedation during spinal anesthesia.

机译:脊髓麻醉期间镇静镇静的有效部位靶控输注和丙泊酚手动输注的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy of sedation of propofol infusion during spinal anesthesia between effective-site target controlled infusion and manually controlled infusion during spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty inpatients scheduled for elective surgery undergoing spinal anesthesia were studied. The patients were allocated to one of two groups. Each group has 30 patients. The TCI group (n = 30) received propofol infusion using effective-site target controlled infusion. The initial target concentration of the effective site of propofol was 1.5 microg/ml. The MCI group (n = 30) received initial bolus 0.5 mg/kg and initial infusion rate 1.5 mg/kg/hr. The anesthesiologist adjusted to increase or decrease the infusion rate in both groups every minute in order to maintain the desired level of sedation (OAA/S score of 3 or 4). Hemodynamic, OAA/S score, the induction time, propofol dose, complications were recorded. RESULTS: The TCI group achieved the desired level of sedation (OAA/S score 3 or 4) faster than MCI group. The patients in TCI group had sedation score < 3 more than MCI group during surgery. Mean arterial pressure of TCI group were significantly lower than the MCI group at 15, 30, 45 min. Four patients in the TCI group was experienced airway obstruction. Two patients in the TCI group aspirated saliva and choked when they were sleeping. Eight patients in the TCI group and one patient in the MCI group were restless and there were intermittent patient movements. CONCLUSION: The clinical benefit when used for sedation during spinal anesthesia of MCI was not different from TCI. There were complications in the TCI group more than the MCI group.
机译:目的:比较脊髓麻醉期间有效部位目标控制输注和手动控制输注之间的异丙酚镇静效果。材料与方法:研究了60名计划进行脊柱麻醉的择期手术的住院患者。患者被分为两组之一。每组有30名患者。 TCI组(n = 30)接受有效部位靶控输注丙泊酚输注。异丙酚有效位点的初始目标浓度为1.5微克/毫升。 MCI组(n = 30)初次推注0.5 mg / kg,初次输注速率1.5 mg / kg / hr。麻醉师调整了每分钟增加或减少两组的输注速度,以维持所需的镇静水平(OAA / S评分为3或4)。记录血流动力学,OAA / S评分,诱导时间,异丙酚剂量,并发症。结果:TCI组比MCI组更快达到所需的镇静水平(OAA / S评分为3或4)。 TCI组患者在手术过程中的镇静评分<3分。在15、30、45分钟时,TCI组的平均动脉压显着低于MCI组。 TCI组中有4例患者出现气道阻塞。 TCI组的两名患者在睡觉时吸唾液并and咽。 TCI组中的8例患者和MCI组中的1例患者不安,并且患者运动间歇。结论:在MCI脊髓麻醉期间使用镇静剂的临床益处与TCI并无区别。 TCI组的并发症多于MCI组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号