首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings
【24h】

Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings

机译:评估中心维度有效性的进一步证据:对维度等级的增量标准相关有效性的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the incremental variance in job performance explained by assessment center (AC) dimensions over and above personality and cognitive ability. The authors extend previous research by using meta-analysis to examine the relationships between AC dimensions, personality. cognitive ability, and job performance. The results indicate that the 7 summary AC dimensions postulated by W. Arthur, Jr., E. A. Day, T. L. McNelly, & P. S. Edens (2003) are distinguishable from popular individual difference constructs and explain a sizeable proportion of variance in job performance beyond cognitive ability and personality.
机译:这项研究调查了评估中心(AC)维度在人格和认知能力之外的工作绩效增量差异。作者通过使用荟萃分析来扩展AC维度,个性之间的关系,从而扩展了以前的研究。认知能力和工作表现。结果表明,由W. Arthur,Jr.,EA Day,TL McNelly和PS Edens(2003)提出的7个汇总AC维度与流行的个体差异构造可以区分开,并解释了超出认知能力的工作绩效差异很大和个性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号