首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Impact of food supplementation on weight loss in randomised-controlled dietary intervention trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Impact of food supplementation on weight loss in randomised-controlled dietary intervention trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在随机对照饮食干预试验中补充食物对减肥的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dietary trials provide evidence for practice and policy guidelines, but poor adherence may confound results. Food supplementation may improve adherence to dietary interventions, but the impact of supplementation on study outcomes is not known. The aim of this review was to examine the impact of food supplementation on weight loss in dietary intervention trials. The databases Scopus, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for dietary intervention trials published between January 2004 and March 2015 using the following keyword combinations: 'trial' OR 'intervention', 'food' OR 'diet', 'weight loss' and 'adherence' OR 'adherence'. Studies were included if food was provided to at least one study group and both 'weight change' and 'adherence' were reported. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess weighted mean differences (WMD) in body weight (change or final mean values). The included studies formed two groups: trials involving an intervention group supplemented with a food and a control without food supplementation (food v. no food), and trials in which food was provided to all subjects (food v. food) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42015017563). In total, sixteen studies were included. Significant weight reduction was reported in the food v. no food studies (WMD -0.74 kg; 95% CI -1.40, -0.08; P=0.03, I-2=63 %). A non-significant increase in weight was found among the food v. food studies (WMD 0.84 kg; 95% CI -0.60, 2.27; P=0.25, I-2=0 %). Food supplementation appeared to result in greater weight loss in dietary trials. Energy restrictions and intensity of interventions were other significant factors influencing weight loss.
机译:饮食试验为实践和政策指南提供了证据,但依从性差可能会混淆结果。补充食物可能会提高对饮食干预的依从性,但补充对研究结果的影响尚不清楚。这篇综述的目的是在饮食干预试验中研究补充食物对减肥的影响。搜索数据库Scopus,PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,以查找2004年1月至2015年3月之间发布的饮食干预试验,其中使用了以下关键字组合:“试验”或“干预”,“食品”或“饮食”,“减肥”和“坚持”或“坚持”。如果向至少一个研究组提供食物,并且报告了“体重变化”和“依从性”,则包括研究。进行随机效应荟萃分析以评估体重的加权均数差(WMD)(变化或最终均值)。所包括的研究分为两组:涉及干预组的食物补充试验和不添加食物的对照试验(食物诉无食物),以及向所有受试者提供食物的试验(食物诉食物)(PROSPERO注册: CRD42015017563)。总共包括16个研究。在食品与无食品研究中报告了体重的显着降低(WMD -0.74 kg; 95%CI -1.40,-0.08; P = 0.03,I-2 = 63%)。在食品与食品研究中发现体重没有显着增加(WMD 0.84 kg; 95%CI -0.60,2.27; P = 0.25,I-2 = 0%)。在饮食试验中,补充食物似乎可以减轻体重。能量限制和干预强度是影响减肥的其他重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号