...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Point counterpoint: the function of contradictions on an interdisciplinary health care team.
【24h】

Point counterpoint: the function of contradictions on an interdisciplinary health care team.

机译:点对点:跨学科医疗团队的矛盾功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this qualitative study we used Dialectical Theory to analyze contradictions occurring between medical doctors (MDs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) working collaboratively on a health care team. The analysis of interview data revealed contradictions in two areas: (1) NPs espouse a need for heightened autonomy in their working associations with medical doctors, whereas conversely, MDs emphasize a need for ongoing connection, and (2) MDs argue that NPs should be more proactive problem solvers and frame their working relationships as educational. However, NPs argue that MDs enact patterns of behavior that limit proactive problem solving and curtail the educational potential of those relationships, thus reinforcing predictable work routines. Both areas of contradiction constitute what dialectical theorist Leslie Baxter refers to as oppositions. study concludes with an assessment of how such contradictions might constitute developmental opportunities for NPs and MDs working in collaboration.
机译:在这项定性研究中,我们使用了辩证理论来分析在医疗团队中合作工作的医生(MD)与护士(NP)之间的矛盾。对访谈数据的分析揭示了两个方面的矛盾:(1)NP支持与医生的工作往来具有更大的自主权,而相反,MD则强调需要持续的联系;(2)MD认为NP应该是更积极主动的问题解决者,并把他们的工作关系定性为教育但是,NP认为,MD会制定行为模式,从而限制主动解决问题并降低这些关系的教育潜力,从而加强了可预测的工作程序。这两个矛盾领域构成了辩证理论家莱斯利·巴克斯特所说的对立面。研究最后评估了这种矛盾如何构成NP和MD协作的发展机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号