首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >COMPARISON OF PERSONALITY TYPES AND LEARNING STYLES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS, AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT STUDENTS, AND FACULTY IN AN AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
【24h】

COMPARISON OF PERSONALITY TYPES AND LEARNING STYLES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS, AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT STUDENTS, AND FACULTY IN AN AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

机译:农学与生物工程系学生的人格类型与学习风格的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated differences in learning styles and personality types among engineering students, agricultural systems management students, and faculty in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. Learning styles and personality types were evaluated using the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), respectively. Mean values for the GEFT for all three groups indicated a strong preference for the field-independent learning style. There were no significant differences in MBTI type preferences between engineering students and faculty. However, the agricultural systems management students differed significantly (p 0.05) from faculty in their preference for Perceiving and from engineering students in their preference for Sensing. Results of the study are useful in helping faculty better understand and improve the teaching and learning process involving the two groups of students
机译:这项研究调查了宾夕法尼亚州立大学农业与生物工程系的工程专业学生,农业系统管理专业学生和教职员工在学习风格和性格类型上的差异。学习风格和性格类型分别使用小组嵌入式数字测试(GEFT)和Myers-Briggs类型指标(MBTI)进行了评估。所有三个组的GEFT平均值均表示非常偏爱与领域无关的学习方式。工科学生与教职员工的MBTI类型偏好没有显着差异。但是,农业系统管理专业的学生在感知方面的偏好与教师之间的差异显着(p <0.05),而工程技术专业的学生在感知方面的偏好差异很大(p <0.05)。研究结果有助于帮助教师更好地理解和改善涉及两组学生的教学过程

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号