首页> 外文学位 >A factor analysis of the preferred learning styles of Industrial Technology and Engineering undergraduate students at North Carolina Agriculture and Technical State University and at Iowa State University.
【24h】

A factor analysis of the preferred learning styles of Industrial Technology and Engineering undergraduate students at North Carolina Agriculture and Technical State University and at Iowa State University.

机译:对北卡罗来纳州农业和技术州立大学和爱荷华州立大学工业技术与工程专业本科生的偏爱学习方式进行因素分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the learning style preferences of African American and European American undergraduate students in the Industrial Technology and Engineering programs at North Carolina A&T State University and Iowa State University. In this study, the independent variables employed were ethnicity, discipline, and the named institutions. The dependent variables were the 20 learning style preferences in the Productivity Environmental Survey (PEPS). Convenience sampling was used to collect 540 students. A factor analysis was used to determine the preferred learning styles for African American and European American students at each institution. In addition, the hypotheses were tested by the Box's M test in the discriminant analysis. The hypotheses were tested at an a priori level of .05 to ascertain significant differences in the factor structures or groups.; The findings of the study concluded that: (1) there were differences in the factor loading profiles of African American and European American students at each institution, regardless of discipline, and (2) there were no differences between the factor loading profiles of Industrial Technology and Engineering students at either institution. Further analyses were generated to determine additional findings on African American and European American learning styles within their respective disciplines. The analyses consisted of examining if there were differences between factor loading profiles by combining both ethnic groups from each program, regardless of institution. The findings concluded that there were no differences between the factor loading profiles of the students enrolled in the two programs.
机译:这项研究在北卡罗莱纳州A&T州立大学和爱荷华州立大学的工业技术和工程课程中研究了非裔美国人和欧洲裔本科生的学习风格偏好。在这项研究中,所采用的独立变量是种族,纪律和命名的机构。因变量是生产力环境调查(PEPS)中的20种学习风格偏好。便利抽样用于收集540名学生。因子分析用于确定每个机构的非洲裔美国人和欧洲裔学生的首选学习方式。此外,在判别分析中通过Box的M检验检验了假设。假设在0.05的先验水平上进行了检验,以确定因素结构或组之间的显着差异。该研究的结论是:(1)每个学院的非洲裔美国人和欧洲裔学生的因子负荷曲线都存在差异,而与学科无关,并且(2)工业技术的因子负荷曲线之间没有差异。以及任一机构的工科学生。进行了进一步的分析,以确定在各自学科内有关非裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人学习风格的其他发现。分析包括通过组合每个程序中的两个族裔来检查因素加载曲线之间是否存在差异,而与机构无关。调查结果得出结论,在这两个程序中注册的学生的因子负荷曲线之间没有差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fazarro, Dominick E.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Education Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 144 p.
  • 总页数 144
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 T-4;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号