首页> 外文期刊>Thin-Walled Structures >Comparison of numerically dissipative schemes for structural dynamics: Generalized-alpha versus energy-decaying methods
【24h】

Comparison of numerically dissipative schemes for structural dynamics: Generalized-alpha versus energy-decaying methods

机译:结构动力学数值耗散方案的比较:广义 - α与能量腐烂方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We revisit some existing time-stepping schemes for structural dynamics with the algorithmic dissipation that fall either into the class of generalized-alpha methods or into the class of energy-decaying (and momentum-conserving) methods. Some of the considered schemes are designed for the second-order and some for the first-order form of the differential equations of motion. We perform a comparison (for linear dynamics) of their accuracy, dissipation, dispersion, as well as of the overshoot. In order to study how these features extend to nonlinear dynamics, we choose numerical tests on shell-like examples. Shell models are a difficult check for dynamic schemes because numerically stiff equations need to be solved as an effect of a large difference between the bending (and shear) and the membrane deformation modes. For the considered schemes we illustrate their ability to decay/dissipate energy, their ability to fully/approximately conserve the angular momentum, and nonlinear order of accuracy by error indicators.
机译:我们重新审视结构动态的一些现有的时间步进方案,其算法耗散地落入通用 - α方法的类别或进入能量腐烂(和动量节省)方法中的类别。一些考虑的方案被设计用于二阶和一些用于差动运动方程的一阶形式的。我们执行其准确性,耗散,色散以及过冲的比较(用于线性动态)。为了研究这些功能如何扩展到非线性动力学,我们可以选择类似壳种示例的数值测试。壳体模型是动态方案的难以检查,因为需要解决弯曲(和剪切)和膜变形模式之间具有很大差异的效果的数值刚反的方程。对于所考虑的计划,我们说明了他们腐烂/消散能量的能力,它们完全/大致节省角动量的能力,并且通过误差指示器的准确性的非线性顺序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号