首页> 外文期刊>Reading and Writing >Identification of sub-types of students with learning disabilities in reading and its implications for Chinese word recognition and instructional methods in Hong Kong primary schools
【24h】

Identification of sub-types of students with learning disabilities in reading and its implications for Chinese word recognition and instructional methods in Hong Kong primary schools

机译:香港小学阅读障碍学生的亚型识别及其对中文单词识别和教学方法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper consists of three studies. The first study aimed to identify sub-types of students with learning disabilities in reading. Based on the dual-route model of reading, words may be read using either a lexical (words are recognized as wholes) or a sub-lexical (words are recognized through grapheme-phoneme correspondence) procedure. Castles and Coltheart (1993) provided evidence for the existence of these two mechanisms in English reading. They suggested that deficits in one and/or the other mechanism would lead to different patterns of reading disability. Surface dyslexia results from an impairment of the lexical procedure with an intact phonological route to reading. Phonological dyslexia results from a deficit in the grapheme-phoneme transformation mechanism. A higher percentage of surface dyslexia was identified in the present study. The aim of the second study was to analyze reading errors to support the existence of surface and phonological dyslexic patterns in Chinese reading. The results showed that students with surface dyslexic pattern made more phonological errors, whereas students with phonological dyslexic pattern made more semantic errors. These two studies indicate that students with learning disabilities could have different strengths and weaknesses and could have different preferences for recognizing Chinese characters and different responses to instructional methods. The third study was designed to test the effects of different teaching methods and different kinds of Chinese characters on students with learning disabilities. In general, the analytic method was found more effective for students with surface dyslexic pattern and the whole-word method for those with the phonological dyslexic pattern. The findings of this study showed the importance of identifying the strengths of the different sub-types of readers and the need to choose appropriate instructional methods accordingly.
机译:本文包括三项研究。第一项研究旨在识别阅读中有学习障碍的学生的亚类型。基于阅读的双路线模型,可以使用词汇(单词被识别为整体)或次词汇(单词通过音素-音素对应识别)过程来阅读单词。 Castles and Coltheart(1993)为英语阅读中存在这两种机制提供了证据。他们认为,一种和/或另一种机制的缺陷会导致阅读障碍的不同模式。表面阅读障碍是由于完整的语音阅读途径导致词汇过程受损。音素阅读障碍是由音素-音素转换机制的缺陷引起的。在本研究中鉴定出较高百分比的表面阅读障碍。第二项研究的目的是分析阅读错误,以支持中文阅读中表面和语音诵读困难模式的存在。结果表明,具有表面阅读障碍模式的学生犯了更多的语音错误,而具有语音阅读障碍模式的学生犯了更多的语义错误。两项研究表明,有学习障碍的学生可能有不同的长处和短处,并且在识别汉字和对教学方法的反应上可能有不同的偏好。第三项研究旨在测试不同的教学方法和不同的汉字对学习障碍学生的影响。通常,分析方法被发现对于表面阅读障碍模式的学生更有效,而全单词方法对于具有语音阅读障碍模式的学生更有效。这项研究的结果表明,确定不同亚型读者的长处非常重要,因此需要选择适当的教学方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号