...
首页> 外文期刊>Personnel Review >Modeling leadership and team performance: The mediation of collective efficacy and the moderation of team justice
【24h】

Modeling leadership and team performance: The mediation of collective efficacy and the moderation of team justice

机译:领导力和团队绩效建模:集体效能的调解和团队正义的调和

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a research model that explains team performance based on social cognitive theory and social exchange theory. In the model, team performance indirectly relates to three kinds of leadership (i.e., charismatic, autocratic and considerate) via the full mediation of collective efficacy. At the same time, team justice as a focus in this study is examined as a moderator in the model.Design/methodology/approach The research hypotheses of this study were empirically tested using two-wave data collection across insurance sales teams from a leading bank holding company which is the largest bank holding company in Taiwan. In the first-wave data collection, researchers of this study surveyed six people anonymously from each sales team, including a team leader and five team members. Three months later, the researchers conducted the second-wave data collection by obtaining team performance data from the department of human resource management, which was an independent rater for each team's performance. Two-wave data collection from 59 teams was achieved for verifying the hypothesized effects.Findings The team-level test results show that collective efficacy fully mediates the relationship between charismatic leadership and team performance and between considerate leadership and team performance. Justice moderates the relationship between collective efficacy and team performance and between charismatic leadership and collective efficacy.Originality/value This study has two major theoretical implications. First, this study conceptualized three distinct kinds of leadership as major determinants of team performance from a social exchange perspective. Such a theoretical conceptualization of leadership not only broadens the boundary of leadership beyond traditional one such as transactional leadership based on the theory of contingent reward but also closely reflects the practical status quo of leadership of teams. Second, this research incorporated social exchange theory into the framework of team performance in social cognitive theory. Specifically, this study theorized and validated justice as a moderator in the development of team performance.
机译:目的本文的目的是建立一个基于社会认知理论和社会交流理论来解释团队绩效的研究模型。在该模型中,团队绩效通过集体效能的完全中介间接地与三种领导力(即魅力,专制和体贴)相关。同时,以团队主持人作为本研究的重点,在模型中作为主持人进行了研究。设计/方法论/方法本研究的研究假设使用来自领先银行的跨保险销售团队的两波数据收集进行了实证检验。控股公司,这是台湾最大的银行控股公司。在第一波数据收集中,本研究的研究人员匿名调查了每个销售团队中的六个人,其中包括团队负责人和五名团队成员。三个月后,研究人员通过从人力资源管理部门获取团队绩效数据进行了第二波数据收集,该部门是每个团队绩效的独立评估者。通过对59个团队的两波数据收集,验证了假设的效果。团队水平的测试结果表明,集体效能充分中介了魅力型领导与团队绩效之间以及体贴的领导与团队绩效之间的关系。正义调和了集体效能与团队绩效之间的关系,以及超凡领导力与集体效能之间的关系。原创性/价值本研究具有两个主要的理论意义。首先,本研究从社交交流的角度将三种不同类型的领导概念化为团队绩效的主要决定因素。这种领导力的理论概念不仅扩大了领导力的范围,超越了基于偶然性奖励理论的交易型领导力等传统方法,而且还密切反映了团队领导力的实际状况。其次,本研究将社会交换理论纳入了社会认知理论中的团队绩效框架。具体而言,本研究从理论上验证了正义作为团队绩效发展中的调节者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号