首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Food Processing and Preservation >Comparison of physical and chemical properties of wheat flour, fermented yam flour, and unfermented yam flour
【24h】

Comparison of physical and chemical properties of wheat flour, fermented yam flour, and unfermented yam flour

机译:小麦粉,发酵山药粉和未发酵山药粉的理化性质比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Yam is a root and tuber climbing plant and main calorie source in some tropical regionsof Africa. In this study, properties of fermented (brown) yam flour (FYF) andunfermented (white) yam flour (UYF) were compared with refined wheat flour (RWF).The yam flours were lower in protein (3.3%–5.9%), arabinoxylans (0.93%–1.40%),phytic acid (0.17–0.53 mg/g), phenolic acids (0.57–2.28 mg FAE/g), amylose (17.3%–22.6%), and fat (0.2%–0.4%) but higher in potassium 119–845 mg/100 g), ash(1.70%–2.21%), total starch (73.8%–74.2%) and fiber contents (6.8%–7.0%). All thesamples exhibited high (>90) estimated glycemic index (eGI) values. However, FYFand UFY had significantly (p < 0.05) lower eGI than RWF. Thermal studies showedthat FYF and UYF required more energy for gelatinization than RWF. Compared toRWF, FYF swelled more rapidly and retrograded faster. FYF had significantly(p < 0.05) higher gel firmness than RWF and UYF. Overall, the flours exhibited differentcharacteristics which will impact functional and nutritional properties.
机译:山药是块根和块茎攀缘植物,是非洲某些热带地区的主要卡路里来源。在这项研究中,将发酵的(棕色)山药粉(FYF)和 r 未发酵的(白)山药粉(UYF)与精制的小麦粉(RWF)进行比较。 r n山药粉的蛋白质含量较低(3.3) %–5.9%),阿拉伯木聚糖(0.93%–1.40%), n植酸(0.17–0.53 mg / g),酚酸(0.57–2.28 mg FAE / g),直链淀粉(17.3%– r n22 0.6%)和脂肪(0.2%–0.4%),但在119–845 mg / 100 g钾中更高,灰分(1.70%–2.21%),总淀粉(73.8%–74.2%)和纤维含量(6.8%–7.0%)。所有样本均显示出较高的(> 90)估计的血糖指数(eGI)值。但是,FYF r n和UFY的eGI显着低于RWF(p <0.05)。热学研究 r n与RWF相比,FYF和UYF糊化所需的能量更多。与 r nRWF相比,FYF膨胀得更快,并且退缩得更快。与RWF和UYF相比,FYF的凝胶硬度显着提高 r n(p <0.05)。总体而言,面粉表现出不同的 r n特性,这会影响功能和营养特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号