...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Providing Instruction Based on Students’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning
【24h】

Providing Instruction Based on Students’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning

机译:提供基于学生学习风格偏好的指令并没有提高学习

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Despite a lack of empirical evidence, teaching to a student’s perceived learning style remains common practice in education (Pashler et al., 2009). Having conducted an extensive review of the literature, Pashler et al. (2009) noted, "...very few studies have even used an experimental methodology capable of testing the validity of learning styles applied to education" (p. 105). Author (2015) published the first study following the experimental design prescribed by Pashler et al. They examined the extent to which learning style predicts comprehension and retention based on mode of instruction (visual/auditory). Their study has been noted as "The only study located through the systematic literature search across six different databases and the screening of more than 1000 records that was totally aligned with Pashler's criteria" (Aslaksen & Loras, 2018, p.3.). The caveat to the 2015 study is that it was conducted with adult learners. The current study uses the same design and methodology as its predecessor, but on a school-aged population, making it the first of its kind. Consistent with earlier findings with adults, results failed to find a significant relationship between learning style preference and comprehension. Fifth-graders with a visual learning style scored higher than those with an auditory learning style on listening and reading comprehension measures. As such, and counter to current educational beliefs and practices, teachers may actually be doing a disservice to students by using resources to determine their learning style and then tailoring the curriculum to mesh with that learning style.
机译:尽管缺乏经验证据,但对学生感知的学习风格的教学仍然是教育的常见做法(Pashler等,2009)。对文献进行了广泛的审查,Pashler等。 (2009)注意到,“......很少有研究甚至使用了能够测试应用于教育的学习方式的有效性的实验方法”(第105页)。作者(2015年)在Pashler等人规定的实验设计之后发表了第一项研究。他们检查了学习风格的程度,基于教学模式(视觉/听觉)的方式预测理解和保留。他们的学习已被指出,“唯一通过系统文献搜索遍布六个不同的数据库的唯一研究以及筛选超过1000个与Pashler的标准完全对齐的记录”(Aslaksen&Loras,2018,P.3。)。 2015年研究的警告是它与成人学习者进行。目前的研究使用与其前任相同的设计和方法,而是在学校年龄的人口上,使其成为它的第一个。与早期调查结果一致,结果未能找到学习风格偏好与理解之间的重要关系。第五年级学习风格的视觉学习风格高于听觉和阅读理解措施的听觉学习风格。因此,并抵制当前的教育信仰和实践,教师实际上可以通过利用资源来确定他们的学习风格,然后定制课程与学习风格来定制课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号