首页> 外文期刊>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Shiga Toxin Gene Loss and Transfer In Vitro and In Vivo during Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O26 Infection in Humans
【24h】

Shiga Toxin Gene Loss and Transfer In Vitro and In Vivo during Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O26 Infection in Humans

机译:人体出血性大肠杆菌O26感染期间志贺毒素基因的丢失和体内外转移

获取原文
           

摘要

Escherichia coli serogroup O26 consists of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC). The former produces Shiga toxins (Stx), major determinants of EHEC pathogenicity, encoded by bacteriophages; the latter is Stx negative. We have isolated EHEC O26 from patient stools early in illness and aEPEC O26 from stools later in illness, and vice versa. Intrapatient EHEC and aEPEC isolates had quite similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns, suggesting that they might have arisen by conversion between the EHEC and aEPEC pathotypes during infection. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether EHEC O26 can lose stx genes and whether aEPEC O26 can be lysogenized with Stx-encoding phages from EHEC O26 in vitro. The stx2 loss associated with the loss of Stx2-encoding phages occurred in 10% to 14% of colonies tested. Conversely, Stx2- and, to a lesser extent, Stx1-encoding bacteriophages from EHEC O26 lysogenized aEPEC O26 isolates, converting them to EHEC strains. In the lysogens and EHEC O26 donors, Stx2-converting bacteriophages integrated in yecE or wrbA. The loss and gain of Stx-converting bacteriophages diversifies PFGE patterns; this parallels findings of similar but not identical PFGE patterns in the intrapatient EHEC and aEPEC O26 isolates. EHEC O26 and aEPEC O26 thus exist as a dynamic system whose members undergo ephemeral interconversions via loss and gain of Stx-encoding phages to yield different pathotypes. The suggested occurrence of this process in the human intestine has diagnostic, clinical, epidemiological, and evolutionary implications.
机译:大肠杆菌O26血清群由肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)和非典型肠致病性大肠杆菌(aEPEC)组成。前者产生志贺毒素(Stx),这是EHEC致病性的主要决定因素,由噬菌体编码。后者是Stx阴性。我们从患病早期的患者粪便中分离了EHEC O26,并从患病后期的粪便中分离了aEPEC O26,反之亦然。住院患者的EHEC和aEPEC分离株具有非常相似的脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)模式,表明它们可能是由于感染期间EHEC和aEPEC病态之间的转化而引起的。为了验证该假设,我们询问EHEC O26是否可以丢失stx基因,以及aEPEC O26是否可以在体外用EHEC O26的Stx编码噬菌体裂解。与Stx2编码噬菌体丢失相关的stx2丢失发生在10%至14%的测试菌落中。相反,来自EHEC O26溶血的aEPEC O26分离株的Stx2编码噬菌体,以及在较小程度上编码Stx1的噬菌体,将其转化为EHEC菌株。在溶原菌和EHEC O26供体中,Stx2转化噬菌体整合在yecE或wrbA中。转化Stx的噬菌体的损失和获得使PFGE模式多样化。这与在住院患者EHEC和aEPEC O26分离物中相似但不完全相同的PFGE模式的发现相似。因此,EHEC O26和aEPEC O26作为一个动态系统存在,其成员通过Stx编码噬菌体的丢失和获得而经历短暂的相互转化,从而产生不同的病态类型。该过程在人肠中的建议发生具有诊断,临床,流行病学和进化意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号