...
首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >Associations of parental feeding styles with child snacking behaviour and weight in the context of general parenting
【24h】

Associations of parental feeding styles with child snacking behaviour and weight in the context of general parenting

机译:一般育儿背景下父母喂养方式与儿童零食行为和体重的关系

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objective To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal (one-year follow-up) associations of parental feeding styles with child snacking behaviour and weight in the context of general parenting, taking into account the multidimensionality of the controlling feeding style. Design Linear regression analyses were performed. Parents completed a questionnaire to measure five feeding style dimensions (Instrumental Feeding, Emotional Feeding, Encouragement, Overt Control and Covert Control) and children's fruit, energy-dense snack and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intakes. Children's height and weight were measured to calculate their BMI Z-scores. Moderation by parenting style was tested by adding interaction terms to the regression analyses. Setting Observational study in the Netherlands. Subjects Parenta€“child dyads (n 1275) participating in the INPACT (IVO Nutrition and Physical Activity Child cohorT) study; children were (on average) 9 years of age. Results Instrumental Feeding and Emotional Feeding were negatively related to child fruit intake one year later and positively to (changes in) child energy-dense snack intake. Encouragement was negatively related to child energy-dense snacking and SSB intake one year later. Overt Control was cross-sectionally and prospectively related to (changes in) child energy-dense snacking and SSB intake in a negative direction. Covert Control showed similar associations with child energy-dense snacking and SSB intake as Overt Control. Although Covert Control was also positively related to child fruit intake and (changes in) child BMI Z-score, bootstrapping analyses revealed only a differential effect of Overt Control and Covert Control on child BMI Z-score one year later, with Covert Control displaying a stronger, positive association. Moderation analyses showed that some significant associations between parental feeding styles and outcome measures were dependent on the degree of psychological control and behavioural control. Conclusions Instrumental Feeding and Emotional Feeding may have a detrimental impact on children's snacking behaviour, while Encouragement, Overt Control and Covert Control may lead to less energy-dense snacking and less SSB intake. Overt Control and Covert Control have differential effects on child BMI Z-score one year later, which supports the idea that they should be treated as separate constructs. Prospective studies with a longer follow-up may elucidate the causal pathways between the various feeding styles and children's snacking behaviour and weight, as well as the moderating influences of psychological and behavioural control.
机译:摘要目的在考虑一般控制育儿方式的多维性的基础上,研究父母喂养方式与儿童零食行为和体重的横断面和纵向联系(一年随访)。设计进行线性回归分析。父母完成了一份问卷调查,以测量五个喂养方式维度(工具喂养,情感喂养,鼓励,公开控制和秘密控制)以及儿童的水果,高能量小吃和含糖饮料(SSB)摄入量。测量儿童的身高和体重,以计算其BMI Z得分。通过将交互作用项添加到回归分析中来测试通过养育方式进行的调节。在荷兰进行观察性研究。参加INPACT(IVO营养和身体活动儿童队列)研究的父母子女二元组(n 1275);儿童平均年龄为9岁。结果一年后,仪器喂养和情感喂养与儿童水果摄入量呈负相关,与儿童能量密集型零食的摄入量(变化)呈正相关。鼓励与一年后儿童能量密集型零食和SSB摄入量呈负相关。明显和明显地与儿童能量密集型零食(SSB摄入量)的变化(和变化)呈负相关。秘密控制显示出与儿童能量密集型零食和SSB摄入量相似的关联,与明显控制相似。尽管隐蔽控制也与儿童水果摄入量和儿童BMI Z分数(变化)呈正相关,但自举分析显示,一年后,“隐蔽控制”和“隐蔽控制”对儿童BMI Z分数的影响不同,“隐蔽控制”显示加强,积极的联系。适度分析表明,父母的进食方式与结果测量之间的一些重要关联取决于心理控制和行为控制的程度。结论仪器喂养和情绪喂养可能会对儿童的零食行为产生不利影响,而鼓励,公开控制和秘密控制可能会导致低能量的零食和较少的SSB摄入。公开控制和秘密控制对一年后的孩子BMI Z评分有不同的影响,这支持将它们视为独立构造的想法。长期随访的前瞻性研究可以阐明各种喂养方式与儿童零食行为和体重之间的因果关系,以及心理和行为控制的调节作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号