首页> 外文期刊>Mathematics Education Trends and Research >The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Students' Achievement And Attitudes Towards Mathematics
【24h】

The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Students' Achievement And Attitudes Towards Mathematics

机译:现实主义数学教育方法对学生学习成绩和态度的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on mathematics achievement and student attitudes towards mathematics. This study also sought determine the relationship between student achievement and attitudes towards mathematics. This study used a quasi-experimental design conducted on 61 high school students at SMA Unggul Sigli. Students were divided into two groups, the treatment group $(n = 30)$ namely, the Realistic Mathematics Approach group (PMR) and the control group $(n = 31)$ namely, the traditional group. This study was conducted for six weeks. The instruments used in this study were the achievement test and the attitudes towards mathematics questionnaires. Data were analyzed using SPSS. To determine the difference in mean achievement and attitudes between the two groups, data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. The result showed significant differences between the Realistic Mathematics Approach and the traditional approach in terms of achievement. The study showed no significant difference between the Realistic Mathematics Approach and the traditional approach in term of attitudes towards mathematics. It can be concluded that the use of realistic mathematics education approach enhanced students' mathematics achievement, but not attitudes towards mathematics. The Realistic Mathematics Education Approach encourage students to participate actively in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Thus, Realistic Mathematics Education Approach is an appropriate methods to improve the quality of teaching and learning process.
机译:进行这项研究是为了确定“现实数学教育方法”对数学成绩和学生对数学态度的影响。这项研究还试图确定学生成绩与数学态度之间的关系。这项研究使用了对SMA Unggul Sigli的61名高中生进行的准实验设计。将学生分为两组,治疗组$(n = 30)$,即现实数学方法组(PMR)和对照组$(n = 31)$,即传统组。这项研究进行了六个星期。本研究中使用的工具是成绩测​​试和对数学问卷的态度。使用SPSS分析数据。为了确定两组在平均成就和态度上的差异,使用单向方差分析对数据进行了分析。结果表明,在成就方面,现实数学方法与传统方法之间存在显着差异。研究表明,在对数学的态度方面,现实数学方法与传统方法之间没有显着差异。可以得出结论,使用现实的数学教育方法可以提高学生的数学成绩,但不能提高他们对数学的态度。现实的数学教育方法鼓励学生积极参与数学的教与学。因此,现实的数学教育方法是提高教学过程质量的一种合适方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号