...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Stakeholders’ contributions to tailored implementation programs: an observational study of group interview methods
【24h】

Stakeholders’ contributions to tailored implementation programs: an observational study of group interview methods

机译:利益相关者对量身定制的实施计划的贡献:对小组访谈方法的观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Tailored strategies to implement evidence-based practice can be generated in several ways. In this study, we explored the usefulness of group interviews for generating these strategies, focused on improving healthcare for patients with chronic diseases. Methods Participants included at least four categories of stakeholders (researchers, quality officers, health professionals, and external stakeholders) in five countries. Interviews comprised brainstorming followed by a structured interview and focused on different chronic conditions in each country. We compared the numbers and types of strategies between stakeholder categories and between interview phases. We also determined which strategies were actually used in tailored intervention programs. Results In total, 127 individuals participated in 25 group interviews across five countries. Brainstorming generated 8 to 120 strategies per group; structured interviews added 0 to 55 strategies. Healthcare professionals and researchers provided the largest numbers of strategies. The type of strategies for improving healthcare practice did not differ systematically between stakeholder groups in four of the five countries. In three out of five countries, all components of the chosen intervention programs were mentioned by the group of researchers. Conclusions Group interviews with different stakeholder categories produced many strategies for tailored implementation of evidence-based practice, of which the content was largely similar across stakeholder categories.
机译:背景技术可以多种方式生成量身定制的实施循证实践的策略。在这项研究中,我们探讨了小组访谈对产生这些策略的有用性,重点在于改善慢性病患者的医疗保健。方法参与者包括五个国家的至少四类利益相关者(研究人员,质量官员,卫生专业人员和外部利益相关者)。访谈包括集思广益,然后进行结构化访谈,重点是每个国家的不同慢性病。我们比较了利益相关者类别之间和访谈阶段之间策略的数量和类型。我们还确定了在定制干预计划中实际使用了哪些策略。结果总共有127个人参加了五个国家的25个小组访谈。集体讨论每组产生8到120个策略;结构化访谈增加了0到55个策略。医疗保健专业人员和研究人员提供了最多的策略。在五个国家中,有四个国家的利益相关者群体之间,改善医疗保健实践的策略类型没有系统地不同。在五分之三的国家中,研究人员提到了所选干预计划的所有组成部分。结论对不同利益相关者类别的小组访谈产生了许多针对实施循证实践的策略,其内容在不同利益相关者类别中基本相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号