首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Can We ‘Read’ the Eye-Movement Patterns of Readers? Unraveling the Relationship Between Reading Profiles and Processing Strategies
【2h】

Can We ‘Read’ the Eye-Movement Patterns of Readers? Unraveling the Relationship Between Reading Profiles and Processing Strategies

机译:我们可以阅读读者的眼动模式吗?揭示阅读档案与处理策略之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an eye-tracking experiment we examined the risky reading hypothesis, in which long saccades and many regressions are considered to be indicative of a proactive reading style (Rayner et al. in Psychol Aging 21(3):448, ; Psychol Aging 24(3):755, ). We did so by presenting short texts—that confirmed or disconfirmed verb-based implicit causality expectations—to two types of readers: proactive readers (long saccades, many regressions) and conservative readers (short saccades, few regressions). Whereas proactive readers used implicit causality information to predict upcoming referents, and slowed down immediately when they encountered a pronoun that was inconsistent with these verb-based expectations, the conservative readers slowed down much later in the sentence. These findings were consistent with the predictions of the risky reading hypothesis and as such presented novel evidence for the general idea that the eye-movement profile of readers reveals valuable information about their processing strategy.
机译:在眼球追踪实验中,我们检查了危险的阅读假设,其中较长的扫视和许多回归被认为是主动阅读风格的指示(Rayner等人在Psychol Aging 21(3):448,; Psychol Aging 24( 3):755,)。为此,我们向两种类型的读者展示了简短的文本(证实或不肯定的基于动词的隐式因果关系期望):积极的读者(漫长的眼神,许多回归)和保守的读者(短的眼神,很少回归)。积极的阅读者使用隐含的因果关系信息来预测即将来临的被指对象,当遇到与这些基于动词的预期不一致的代词时,他们会立即放慢速度,而保守的阅读器在句子的后面放慢了速度。这些发现与对危险阅读假设的预测是一致的,因此为读者的眼动特征揭示了有关其处理策略的有价值信息的一般思想提供了新颖的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号