首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Science >Advanced colorectal cancer subtypes (aCRCS) help select oxaliplatin‐based or irinotecan‐based therapy for colorectal cancer
【2h】

Advanced colorectal cancer subtypes (aCRCS) help select oxaliplatin‐based or irinotecan‐based therapy for colorectal cancer

机译:晚期结直肠癌亚型(ACRC)有助于选择基于奥沙利铂的或基于伊替康的结直肠癌治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) are used as key drugs for the first‐line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no biomarkers have been identified to decide which of the drugs is initially used. In this translational research (TR) of the TRICOLORE trial, the advanced colorectal cancer subtype (aCRCS) was analyzed as a potential biomarker for the selection of OX or IRI. We collected 335 (68.8%) formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens from 487 patients registered in the TRICOLORE trial and performed direct sequencing and immunohistochemical staining of CRC‐related genes, comprehensive gene‐expression analysis, and genome‐wide methylation analysis. The progression‐free survival (PFS) of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in BRAF wild‐type (WT), PTEN‐positive, and aCRCS A1 patients. Among the molecular factors, aCRCS were only associated with the PFS of OX and IRI groups. The PFS of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in aCRCS A1 + B1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41‐0.82; P = .0023). In contrast, the OX group had better PFS compared with the IRI group in aCRCS B2, although this was not statistically significant (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.94‐2.96; P = .083). Nearly half of patients with mCRC (46.8%, aCRCS A1 + B1) respond well to IRI, while only about 18.5% (aCRCS B2) of patients with mCRC responded well to OX. In conclusion, the aCRCS might be a predictive factor for the clinical outcomes of OX‐based and IRI‐based therapies.
机译:Oxaliplatin(牛)和伊立替康(IRI)用作转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)的一线治疗的关键药物。然而,未鉴定生物标志物以确定最初使用哪些药物。在Tricolore试验的这种翻译研究(TR)中,分析了晚期结直肠癌亚型(ACRC)作为选择牛或IRI的潜在生物标志物。我们收集335(68.8%)福尔马林固定,石蜡嵌入式(FFPE)原发性肿瘤标本,来自三理试验中的487名患者,进行了CRC相关基因的直接测序和免疫组化染色,综合基因表达分析和基因组 - 宽甲基化分析。与BRAF野生型(WT),PTEN阳性和ACRCS A1患者的牛群相比,IRI组的无进展生存期(PFS)明显更好。在分子因子中,ACRC仅与牛和IRI组的PFS相关。与ACRCS A1 + B1中的氧组(危险比[HR] = 0.58; 95%置信区间[CI] = 0.41-0.82; p = .0023)相比,IRI组的PFS显着更好。相反,与ACRCS B2中的IRI组相比,氧气组具有更好的PFS,尽管这在统计学上显着(HR = 1.66; 95%CI = 0.94-2.96; p = .083)。近一半的MCRC患者(46.8%,ARCS A1 + B1)对IRI响应良好,而MCRC患者的约18.5%(ACRCS B2)对牛作出良好。总之,ACRC可能是基于牛和基于IRI的疗法的临床结果的预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号