首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of Two Optical-Density-Based Methods and a Plate Count Method for Estimation of Growth Parameters of Bacillus cereus
【2h】

Comparison of Two Optical-Density-Based Methods and a Plate Count Method for Estimation of Growth Parameters of Bacillus cereus

机译:两种基于光密度法和平板计数法估算蜡状芽孢杆菌生长参数的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quantitative microbiological models predicting proliferation of microorganisms relevant for food safety and/or food stability are useful tools to limit the need for generation of biological data through challenge testing and shelf-life testing. The use of these models requires quick and reliable methods for the generation of growth data and estimation of growth parameters. Growth parameter estimation can be achieved using methods based on plate counting and methods based on measuring the optical density. This research compares the plate count method with two optical density methods, namely, the 2-fold dilution (2FD) method and the relative rate to detection (RRD) method. For model organism Bacillus cereus F4810/72, the plate count method and both optical density methods gave comparable estimates for key growth parameters. Values for the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) derived by the 2FD method and by the RRD method were of the same order of magnitude, but some marked differences between the two approaches were apparent. Whereas the 2FD method allowed the derivation of values for lag time (λ) from the data, this was not possible with the RRD method. However, the RRD method gave many more data points per experiment and also gave more data points close to the growth boundary. This research shows that all three proposed methods can be used for parameter estimation but that the choice of method depends on the objectives of the research.
机译:预测与食品安全和/或食品稳定性有关的微生物增殖的定量微生物模型是有用的工具,可以通过挑战性测试和货架寿命测试来限制生成生物学数据的需求。这些模型的使用需要快速可靠的方法来生成生长数据和估算生长参数。可以使用基于板计数的方法和基于测量光密度的方法来实现生长参数估计。本研究将平板计数法与两种光密度法进行了比较,即2倍稀释(2FD)法和相对检测率(RRD)法。对于蜡样芽胞杆菌F4810 / 72的模型生物,平板计数法和两种光密度法均给出了关键生长参数的可比估计。通过2FD方法和RRD方法得出的最大比生长速率(μmax)值处于相同的数量级,但是两种方法之间存在明显的明显差异。 2FD方法允许从数据中得出滞后时间(λ)的值,而RRD方法则不可能。但是,RRD方法在每个实验中提供了更多的数据点,并且还提供了接近生长边界的更多数据点。这项研究表明,所有三种建议的方法都可以用于参数估计,但是方法的选择取决于研究的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号