首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs
【2h】

L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs

机译:L2说话者分解形态复杂的动词:透明派生动词启动的fMRI证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) long-lag priming study, we investigated the processing of Dutch semantically transparent, derived prefix verbs. In such words, the meaning of the word as a whole can be deduced from the meanings of its parts, e.g., wegleggen “put aside.” Many behavioral and some fMRI studies suggest that native (L1) speakers decompose transparent derived words. The brain region usually implicated in morphological decomposition is the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG). In non-native (L2) speakers, the processing of transparent derived words has hardly been investigated, especially in fMRI studies, and results are contradictory: some studies find more reliance on holistic (i.e., non-decompositional) processing by L2 speakers; some find no difference between L1 and L2 speakers. In this study, we wanted to find out whether Dutch transparent derived prefix verbs are decomposed or processed holistically by German L2 speakers of Dutch. Half of the derived verbs (e.g., omvallen “fall down”) were preceded by their stem (e.g., vallen “fall”) with a lag of 4–6 words (“primed”); the other half (e.g., inslapen “fall asleep”) were not (“unprimed”). L1 and L2 speakers of Dutch made lexical decisions on these visually presented verbs. Both region of interest analyses and whole-brain analyses showed that there was a significant repetition suppression effect for primed compared to unprimed derived verbs in the LIFG. This was true both for the analyses over L2 speakers only and for the analyses over the two language groups together. The latter did not reveal any interaction with language group (L1 vs. L2) in the LIFG. Thus, L2 speakers show a clear priming effect in the LIFG, an area that has been associated with morphological decomposition. Our findings are consistent with the idea that L2 speakers engage in decomposition of transparent derived verbs rather than processing them holistically.
机译:在这项功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)长时间启动研究中,我们研究了荷兰语语义透明的派生前缀动词的处理。用这样的词,整个词的含义可以从它的各个部分的含义中推导出来,例如,wegleggen“抛开”。许多行为和某些fMRI研究表明,母语(L1)的说话人会分解透明的衍生词。通常与形态分解有关的大脑区域是左下额回(LIFG)。在非母语(L2)说话者中,几乎没有研究过透明派生词的处理,特别是在功能磁共振成像研究中,结果是矛盾的:一些研究发现,母语者(L2说话者)更加依赖整体(即非分解)处理;有些人发现L1和L2扬声器之间没有区别。在这项研究中,我们想找出荷兰语的第二母语者对荷兰语透明派生前缀动词是否进行分解或整体处理。一半的衍生动词(例如omvallen“ fall down”)的词干(例如vallen“ fall”)以4–6个词的滞后(“ primed”)开头;另一半(例如,沉睡的“入睡”)不是(“未涂底漆的”)。母语为荷兰语的L1和L2说话者对这些视觉呈现的动词做出了词汇决定。感兴趣区域分析和全脑分析都显示,与未启动词的衍生动词相比,LIFG中启动词有明显的重复抑制效果。对于仅针对第二语言说话者的分析,以及针对两个语言组的分析,都是如此。后者没有显示与LIFG中的语言组(L1对L2)的任何交互。因此,L2说话者在LIFG(与形态分解相关的区域)中显示出明显的启动效果。我们的发现与L2说话人参与透明派生动词的分解而不是整体地处理它们的想法是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号