压力源与压力强度对D型人格大学生心理健康的影响研究

摘要

目的 探讨压力源、压力强度与D型人格大学生心理健康之间的关系.方法 采用14条目版本D型人格量表(DS14)、Beck-Srivastava压力量表(BSSI)对800名大学生的人格特征、压力源、压力强度进行检测,同时结合症状自评量表(SCL-90)对其心理健康情况进行相关评定.结果 D型人格大学生的检出率为23.38%,女生数量明显多于男生,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);D型人格大学生BSSI平均得分(81.34±11.24)分,明显高于非D型人格大学生BSSI平均得分(76.41±12.33)分,其差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);D型人格大学生SCL-90量表的9个因子得分均高于非D型人格大学生,但仅在人际关系和抑郁两个因子上得分间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 虽然在同样的学习、生活环境下D型人格大学生的压力强度大于非D型人格大学生,但造成的心理负担差异不大,通过积极心理干预和疏导措施,可以有效缓解其心理压力,减轻压力造成的各种心理问题.%To investigate the relation of psychological health of college students with type D personality with pressure source and pressure level. Methods The type D personality scale - 14 items ( DS14 ) and Beck - Srivastava stress scale ( BSSI ) were taken to test the personalistic features, pressure source and pressure level of 800 college students, and the symptom check list - 90 ( SCL - 90 ) was used to evaluate psychological health of them. Results The detection rate of type D personality among the college students was 23. 38% , and the rate in females was higher than that in males ( P<0. 01 ). The average BSSI score in the students of type D personality ( 81. 34 ± 11. 24 ) was higher than that in the students of non - type D personality (76. 41 ±12. 33 ) ( P <0. 01 ). The SCL -90 scores in 9 factors in the students of type D personality were higher than those in the students of non - type D personality, however only the differences in the scores of two factors of interpersonal relationship and depression were statistically significant ( P < 0. 01 ) . Conclusion Under the same learning and living environments, the pressure level of students with type D personality is higher than that of students with non - type D personality, nevertheless, then-difference of psychological burden is almost the same. Therefore, the measures on active psychological counseling and unblocking could effectively relieve their psychological pressure and reduce all kinds of their psychological problems induced by pressure.