首页> 外文学位 >An investigation of the efficacy of Paris 'Reading and Thinking Strategies' on the reading comprehension and metacognition in reading in learning disabled students.
【24h】

An investigation of the efficacy of Paris 'Reading and Thinking Strategies' on the reading comprehension and metacognition in reading in learning disabled students.

机译:巴黎“阅读与思考策略”对学习障碍学生阅读理解和元认知的功效的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated the efficacy of Paris' (1989) Reading and Thinking Strategies (Level 5/6) on the reading comprehension and metacognitive performances of grades 6 and 7 learning disabled (LD) students. In Intervention Period 1, 19 of the LD students were instructed over a seven week period by the author/researcher using three modules of the reading and thinking strategies (Blueprints for Reading, Tools for Reading, and Road Signs for Reading). Another 19 LD students were assigned to the Control Group and received a more traditional skill-based reading instruction containing no programme of reading strategies. Following the completion of Intervention Period 1, the strategy intervention was replicated with the Control Group which then became the second Experimental Group.;There were significant differences between the Experimental and Control Groups on standardized and criterion measures of reading comprehension in Intervention Period 1 in favour of the Experimental Group. In Intervention Period 2 LD students in the second Experimental Group did replicate the significant improvements achieved by the LD students in the first Experimental Group in Intervention Period 1. (Abstract shortened by UMI.);Students received instruction regarding the purpose of reading, the importance of developing reading plans for different kinds of texts, the need to monitor reading progress, and the use of specific strategies to augment understanding and remembering.
机译:这项研究调查了巴黎(1989)的阅读和思维策略(5/6级)对6年级和7年级学习障碍(LD)学生的阅读理解和元认知表现的功效。在干预期1中,作者/研究人员在七个星期的时间内使用19个LD学生的阅读和思维策略模块(阅读蓝图,阅读工具和阅读路标)对他们进行了指导。另外19名LD学生被分配到对照组,并接受了更传统的基于技能的阅读指导,其中没有任何阅读策略计划。干预期1结束后,与干预组进行战略干预,该干预组随后成为第二个实验组。;实验组和对照组在干预期1的阅读理解的标准化和标准措施上存在显着差异,有利于实验小组的成员。在干预期2中,第二实验组的LD学生确实重复了干预期1中第一实验组的LD学生所取得的重大进步。(摘要由UMI缩短);学生接受了有关阅读目的,重要性的指导为不同类型的文本制定阅读计划,监控阅读进度的需求以及使用特定策略来增强理解和记忆的能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Woodward, Dianne Carol.;

  • 作者单位

    Simon Fraser University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Simon Fraser University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Education Special.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Reading.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 257 p.
  • 总页数 257
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 能源与动力工程;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号