首页> 外文学位 >The teacher efficacy construct and its relationship to attributional dimensions (causal attributions) and attributional style.
【24h】

The teacher efficacy construct and its relationship to attributional dimensions (causal attributions) and attributional style.

机译:教师效能构成及其与归因维度(因果归因)和归因风格的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Teacher efficacy has proven to be an important variable in the study of the educational climate and student achievement. Teacher efficacy is defined as a two-dimensional construct. The dimensions are a competency belief that one has the capacity to affect educational outcomes and an expectancy belief that teaching is effective. This paper attempts a better understanding of the construct of teacher efficacy by analyzing it through the framework of attributional theory and learned helplessness.; Attributional theory assigns causes to outcomes. According to Bernard Weiner's model, perceived causes of outcomes are ability(aptitude) which is defined as an internal-stable attribute, effort which is defined as an internal-unstable attribute, task difficulty which is defined as an external-stable attribute, and chance(luck) which is defined as an external-unstable attribute. Learned helplessness is a perception that outcomes are uncontrollable according to Martin Seligman.; This paper investigated the construct by using the responses from three questionnaires: Teacher Self-Efficacy Instrument(Hillman); Attributional Style Questionnaire (Peterson et al.); and the Teacher Efficacy Scale(Consortium on Chicago School Research).; The responses were statistically examined using a correlation, a biserial correlation, and multiple regression.; The findings were that both the efficacy and expectancy construct correlated negatively with the attribute of luck.; It was found that high levels of efficacy correlated with high levels of expectancy. A further finding was that efficacy and expectancy accounted for approximately 12% of the variance in each other.; Also found was a confounding of the variable of ability. Ability correlated significantly with effort, task difficulty, and luck. It was determined, therefore, that ability was interpreted equivocally by the respondents and not as a stable-internal variable.
机译:实践证明,教师的能力是研究教育氛围和学生成就的重要变量。教师效能被定义为二维结构。维度是一种能力信念,即人们具有影响教育成果的能力,是一种期望信念,即教学是有效的。本文通过归因理论和习得性无助的框架进行分析,试图更好地理解教师效能的构成。归因理论将结果归因于。根据伯纳德·韦纳(Bernard Weiner)的模型,结果的感知原因是能力(能力)定义为内部稳定属性,努力(定义为内部不稳定属性),任务难度(定义为外部稳定属性)和机会(运气),它定义为外部不稳定属性。马丁·塞利格曼(Martin Seligman)认为,习得的无助感是一种结果是不可控的。本文使用三个问卷调查表的问卷调查问卷调查了教师的自我建构能力。归因风格问卷(Peterson等);以及教师效能量表(芝加哥学校研究协会)。使用相关性,二元相关性和多元回归进行统计学检验。研究发现,功效和期望结构均与运气属性负相关。发现高水平的功效与高水平的期望相关。进一步的发现是功效和预期相互之间大约占差异的12%。还发现了能力变量的混淆。能力与努力,任务难度和运气显着相关。因此,可以确定,回答者对能力的解释是模棱两可的,而不是内部的稳定变量。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Loyola University Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 Loyola University Chicago.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 128 p.
  • 总页数 128
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育心理学;教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号