首页> 外文学位 >Levels of cognition of instruction and of students' reflective thinking in a selected Web-enhanced course.
【24h】

Levels of cognition of instruction and of students' reflective thinking in a selected Web-enhanced course.

机译:选定的网络增强课程中的教学认知水平和学生的反思性思维水平。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The development of cognitive instruction, critical thinking, higher level of thinking and problem solving ability in students has been of great concern in the recent past. One way to examine the quality of instruction is to assess the cognitive levels of the teaching and students' reflective thinking. The purpose of this study was to describe the cognitive level of instruction and students' reflective thinking of a selected web-enhanced course at The Ohio State University. The target population for the study consisted of a web-enhanced course at OSU and thirteen graduate students who were enrolled in this course during the Spring Quarter of 2001. In this study, the modified version of Newcomb and Trefz's taxonomy was adopted to assess the cognitive level of teaching and students' reflective thinking. Based on Bloom's taxonomy, Newcomb and Trefz (1987) developed the modified version, which included four specific levels: (1) remembering, (2) processing, (3) creating and (4) evaluating. The results indicated that the most common cognitive level utilized by both teachers and students were the "processing" level and the "remembering" level was utilized least frequently of both of them. Results showed little difference existed between the distributions of the cognitive level of in-class and on-line instruction; however, the results did show that out-of-class assignments attained a higher cognitive level than in-class discourse and on-line course content. The "creating" level was the most common cognitive level utilized in out-of-class assignments. A training program is recommended for teachers who will teach a web-enhanced or web-based course. The program should contain: (1) the familiarity with the technology, (2) on-line class management skills and (3) pedagogical training, such as: higher cognitive level of teaching and the objective classification system.
机译:近年来,认知教学,批判性思维,更高水平的思维能力和解决问题能力的发展一直备受关注。检查教学质量的一种方法是评估教学的认知水平和学生的反思性思维。这项研究的目的是描述俄亥俄州立大学所选网络增强课程的教学认知水平和学生的反思性思维。研究的目标人群包括2001年春季季度在OSU开设的一门网络增强课程和13名研究生。在本研究中,采用了Newcomb和Trefz分类法的修改版来评估认知教学水平和学生的反思性思维。基于Bloom的分类法,Newcomb和Trefz(1987)开发了修改版本,其中包括四个特定级别:(1)记忆,(2)处理,(3)创建和(4)评估。结果表明,教师和学生使用的最常见的认知水平是“处理”水平,而“记忆”水平是两者中最不经常使用的水平。结果表明,课堂教学和在线教学的认知水平分布差异不大。然而,结果确实表明,课堂外作业比课堂上的演讲和在线课程内容具有更高的认知水平。 “创造”水平是课堂外作业中最常见的认知水平。建议为将教授网络增强课程或基于网络课程的教师提供培训计划。该计划应包含:(1)对技术的熟悉程度,(2)在线班级管理技能,以及(3)教学培训,例如:较高的认知水平的教学和客观的分类系统。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kao, Kai-ning.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.; Education Technology.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 127 p.
  • 总页数 127
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育心理学;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号