首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education >Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming
【24h】

Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming

机译:入门编程中的解释,跟踪和写​​作技能之间关系的进一步证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper reports on a replication of earlier studies into a possible hierarchy of programming skills. In this study, the students from whom data was collected were at a university that had not provided data for earlier studies. Also, the students were taught the programming language "Python", which had not been used in earlier studies. Thus this study serves as a test of whether the findings in the earlier studies were specific to certain institutions, student cohorts, and programming languages. Also, we used a non-parametric approach to the analysis, rather than the linear approach of earlier studies. Our results are consistent with the earlier studies. We found that students who cannot trace code usually cannot explain code, and also that students who tend to perform reasonably well at code writing tasks have also usually acquired the ability to both trace code and explain code.
机译:本文报告了将早期研究复制到可能的编程技能层次中的情况。在这项研究中,从中收集数据的学生是在一所大学,而该大学没有提供早期研究的数据。此外,还向学生们教授了编程语言“ Python”,该语言在早期的研究中并未使用。因此,本研究可以检验早期研究的结果是否特定于某些机构,学生群体和编程语言。此外,我们使用非参数方法进行分析,而不是早期研究的线性方法。我们的结果与早期研究一致。我们发现,无法跟踪代码的学生通常无法解释代码,并且倾向于在代码编写任务中表现良好的学生通常也具有跟踪代码和解释代码的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号