首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A LONGITUDINAL STUDY INTO THE ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF STUDENTS IN TECHNOLOGY-FOCUSED VS. HUMANITIES PROGRAMS
【24h】

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A LONGITUDINAL STUDY INTO THE ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF STUDENTS IN TECHNOLOGY-FOCUSED VS. HUMANITIES PROGRAMS

机译:纵向研究进入技术专注于技术的学生的初步研究。人文计划

获取原文

摘要

Attrition rates in junior years of technology-focused programs are much higher than in humanities. As well, in recent years technology-focused programs have been experiencing drops in enrollment, and difficulties in attracting qualified candidates, while admissions to other programs seem unaffected. Such trends are worrying and thus we, as educators, need to improve efforts to better understand our students that would in turn allow the university to better plan and tailor their student success, retention and recruitment programs. This paper reports on the background and initial hypotheses as well as on the first survey results of a new longitudinal study which is intended to provide insight into retention issues, including an investigation of a "filtering effect" of the traditional instruction that the authors hypothesize is taking place and is partly responsible for high dropout rates, as well as for the reduced diversity of the student body as they progress through the technology-focused versus humanities programs. The study will also provide recommendations to improve student engagement and success.
机译:高级技术的专注计划的吸引率远高于人文学科。同样,近年来,专注于技术的方案在招生中遭受辍学,吸引合格的候选人困难,而其他方案的入学似乎不受影响。这样的趋势令人担忧,因此我们作为教育工作者,需要提高努力,更好地了解我们的学生,这些学生又允许大学更好地计划和量身定制他们的学生成功,保留和招聘计划。本文报告了背景和初始假设以及新的纵向研究的第一次调查结果,该研究旨在提供对保留问题的洞察力,包括调查作者假设的传统教学的“过滤效果”发生并部分负责高辍学率,以及通过专注于技术为重点的人体方面的学生机构的多样性减少。该研究还将提供建议,以提高学生参与和成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号