首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1206) “CONTEMPL-ACTION”: CONTEMPLATIVE PEDAGOGY AND CRITICAL PEDAGOGY AS REFLEXIVITY PRACTICES PROMOTING EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION
【24h】

(1206) “CONTEMPL-ACTION”: CONTEMPLATIVE PEDAGOGY AND CRITICAL PEDAGOGY AS REFLEXIVITY PRACTICES PROMOTING EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION

机译:(1206)“遭受思考 - 行动”:沉思教育学和关键教育学作为促进社会行动教育的反射实践

获取原文

摘要

The aim of this paper is to examine, through the description of a research carried out with university students, how the integration between contemplative pedagogy and critical pedagogy can represent a rich soil that promotes, in educational formal, informal and non formal contexts, not just a deep insight into meaning, ethics and goals and values, but social and educational action adequately supported by reflexivity and awareness of the action itself. Supporting, in fact, both the thought about our inner experience and our interdependence with the others, contemplative pedagogy proposes, beside traditional ‘third-person’ academic approaches, a ‘critically-based first.person’ approach grounded on practical experience, with techniques and methods providing an integrated understanding of the subject’s role by building the thought and the contemplative experience in the society and on individuals. On the other hand, critical pedagogy, praxis-based (praxis as action and reflection for the social transformation), combines to a declared educational intent of social change, the necessary introspective ability, so that many educators traceable to this field show aspects characterized by reflective depth and introspection that also reaches contemplative features (just think of poetry and narrative in Danilo Dolci and Paulo Freire, for example, or Don Milani’s faith and layman’s thinking). This integration tells us first that, in the complex educational field, contemplation mustn’t be considered, as in the common sense one might think, disconnected from action. And that not reflective action can be even counterproductive, or in any case lead to situations hard to handle, unless it has adequate reflective tools. It’s therefore essential to think in an integrated way contemplative pedagogy and critical pedagogy, as such dialogue would allow students to knowingly understand the relationships between action and reflection, starting from the theoretical foundations that contemplative practices should be considered such as embodied wisdom, useful to the comprehension of social reality. In fact, contemplative practices possess many tools to work on opening up to newness, sensibility to different contexts, explicit the implicit, trough the awareness of multiple perspectives. This last element enables us to emphasize our relationship with other people without minimizing differences of identity and experience, as the contact with ‘here-and-now’ that helps us growing a subjective and social consciousness essential to support the complexity and the difficulty of interpersonal relationships. Specifically, the research used a mixed convergent parallel quantitative methodology: university students took part to a lab about contemplative practices carried out within LEPE activities, the Epistemological Lab of educational practices, carried out at the Department of Humanistic Studies of the University of Naples "Federico II". Following the workshop, the students were able to reflect about the experience both through the drafting of a logbook, and by compiling a detailed questionnaire built ad hoc and aimed at promoting a metacognitive and critical work on the contemplative practices from part of them. Experience. As far as data processing is concerned, a first analysis was led according to the phenomenological method, with a jury composed of three independent judges who saw and analyzed all the collected material and allowed to identify the emerging categories within the narratives. An analysis of the textual content supported by the use of the T-Lab software was then accomplished. Later, the data emerged from the analysis of the logbooks has been integrated by the data emerged from the in-depth questionnaire. Summarizing the purpose of our work is quite the dialectics between action and contemplation (which we can rename contempl-action) as our intention is to create a reflective field in which students are able to contemplate their own social action, a
机译:本文的目的是通过对大学生进行的研究的描述,沉思教育学和关键教育学的整合如何代表富裕的土壤,促进教育正式,非正式和非正式背景,而不仅仅是深入了解意义,道德和目标和价值观,但通过反射性和对行动本身的认识充分支持了社会和教育行动。事实上,支持我们的内心经历和与其他人的相互依存,沉思教学法提出,既往传统的“第三人的学术方法”,就是一个“批判式的先导”方法,基于实践经验,技术并通过建立社会和个人的思想和沉思经验来提供对主体作用的综合理解。另一方面,基于PRAXIS的PREAAGOGY(PRAXIS作为社会转型的行动和反思),结合了社会变革的宣布的教育意图,必要的内省能力,使许多追溯到该领域的教育工作者展示了特征的方面反思深度和内省也达到沉思特征(只想在Danilo Dolci和Paulo Freire中思考诗歌和叙事,例如,或Don Milani的信仰和外行思想)。这种集成首先告诉我们,在复杂的教育领域,不得考虑沉思,就像常识中可能会思考,断开与行动的连接。而不是反思行为甚至可能是适得其反的,或者在任何情况下都导致难以处理的情况,除非它具有足够的反射工具。因此,必须以综合的方式思考沉思的教育学和关键的教育,因为这些对话将使学生从理论基础开始,学生从理论基础开始就应该被视为所体现的智慧,所以有助于理解社会现实。事实上,沉思实践具有许多工具来开放新性,对不同背景的敏感性,显而易见的,挖掘多个视角的意识。最后一个元素使我们能够强调我们与其他人的关系,而不会最大限度地减少身份和经验的差异,以及与“在这里 - 现在”的联系,这有助于我们越来越多地实现支持复杂性和人际关系难度所必不可少的主观和社会意识关系。具体而言,该研究使用了混合趋同并行定量方法:大学生参加了一个实验室关于lepe活动中进行的沉思实践,教育实践的认识论实验室,在那不勒斯大学的人文研究部门开展了“Federico” II“。在研讨会之后,学生能够通过起草日志来反思经验,并通过编制详细的调查问卷,并旨在从其中一部分促进思想实践的元认知和关键工作。经验。就数据处理而言,首次分析根据现象学方法,陪审团由三名独立法官组成,陪审团持有所有收集的材料,并允许识别叙述内的新兴类别。然后完成了通过使用T-Lab软件支持的文本内容的分析。稍后,从深入调查问卷中出现的数据集成了从对日志分析中出现的数据。总结我们工作的目的是行动和沉思之间的辩证法(我们可以重命名延期行动),因为我们的目的是创建一个学生能够考虑自己的社会行动的反思领域

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号