首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34th Annual >Do students benefit? Writing-to-learn in a digital design laboratory course
【24h】

Do students benefit? Writing-to-learn in a digital design laboratory course

机译:学生受益吗?在数字设计实验室课程中进行写作学习

获取原文

摘要

Communication instruction in engineering education has been formally integrated in numerous engineering programs, as industry and ABET increasingly require oral and written skills for engineering professionals. As engineering programs have adapted to these requirements, the need to understand the benefits of communication instruction to students while they are learning course content is paramount. This paper focuses on the "discipline-specific" method for teaching communication skills and addresses whether or not students learn the discipline-specific material more fully when they are required to write about that material. Data for this research comes from a sophomore-level communication- intensive digital design laboratory course. To assess retention, student answers to a specific final exam question are analyzed over three semesters. During these semesters, different writing assignments were associated with the tested subject matter. The results of this study speak directly to content-driven communication instruction and test performance.
机译:随着行业和ABET对工程专业人士的口头和书面技能的要求越来越高,工程教育中的交流指导已正式集成到众多工程计划中。由于工程程序已经适应了这些要求,因此在学生学习课程内容时,必须了解对学生进行交流教学的好处至关重要。本文关注于“学科特定”的方法来教授交流技巧,并探讨了当学生被要求撰写有关该学科的材料时,他们是否能更充分地学习该学科的材料。这项研究的数据来自于一个二年级的通信密集型数字设计实验室课程。为了评估保留率,将在三个学期中分析学生对特定期末考试问题的答案。在这些学期中,与写作主题相关的写作作业有所不同。这项研究的结果直接说明了内容驱动的沟通指导和测试性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号