首页> 外文会议>IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference >Multiple Representations in Physics: Deliberate Practice Does Not Improve Exam Scores
【24h】

Multiple Representations in Physics: Deliberate Practice Does Not Improve Exam Scores

机译:物理中的多个表示:故意实践不会改善考试分数

获取原文

摘要

Physics problem solving requires the use of verbal, pictorial, diagrammatic, and mathematical representations in order to translate a problem into its underlying mathematical components. This study investigated the effect of explicit deliberate practice on representation skills in introductory physics at the University of Louisville. In a controlled, randomized design, physics students received either deliberate practice or traditional solve-though practice weekly throughout the semester. The deliberate practice instruction focused on translating from verbal to diagrammatic and diagrammatic to mathematical representations. The deliberate practice problem solving intervention had no impact on exam performance or an encoding task developed to measure facility with diagrammatic representations of physics problems. However, performance on the encoding task positively predicted exam performance across conditions. These results suggest that deliberate practice on multiple representations did not demonstrably improve exam scores. However, the ability to encode problem features predicts exam performance more generally.
机译:物理问题解决需要使用口头,图形,示意图和数学表示,以便将问题转化为其底层数学组件。本研究调查了明确的故意实践对路易斯维尔大学介绍物理学中的代表技能的影响。在受控的,随机的设计中,物理学生在整个学期中每周接受故意练习或传统的练习。刻意的练习指令集中在言语中从口头转换到图解和图解到数学表示。解决干预的故意实践问题对考试表现或开发的编码任务没有影响,以衡量了物理问题的图解陈述。但是,在编码任务上的性能跨条件肯定地预测考试表现。这些结果表明,对多个陈述的故意实践并未显着提高考试分数。然而,编码问题特征的能力更普遍预测考试性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号