首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of an implemented quality management system (QMS) at one of the South African government departments: employee perceptions of the effect of the QMS intervention
【2h】

Evaluation of an implemented quality management system (QMS) at one of the South African government departments: employee perceptions of the effect of the QMS intervention

机译:在南非政府部门之一评估实施的质量管理体系(Qms):员工对Qms干预效果的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study is about the employee perceptions of the effect of the Quality Management System intervention that was implemented at one of South Africa’s government departments. This organisation’s Quality Management System being one of the first in the government or public sector in South Africa to be implemented, creates the possibility for this Quality Management System model to be used to develop Quality Management Systems in other departments or organisations belonging to the government or the public sector in South Africa and the Southern African region. According to Madu & Kuei (1995), Quality Management System describes a situation where all business functions are involved in a process of continuous quality improvement. This implies that the development and implementation of Quality Management Systems in government departments and the public sector will improve the quality of services delivery. The findings of this study indicated that a Quality Management System can be used to improve the level of service delivery in the public sector. The Quality Management System should be planned developed and implemented over a period of time in five phases (i) Phase 1 - Determination of the scope of Quality Management System implementation (ii) Phase 2 – Training (iii) Phase 3 – Development of Procedures (iv) Phase 4 – Pilot implementation of procedures (v) Phase 5 – Evaluation of Quality Management System and rollout. It usually takes three or more years to establish an organisation-wide Quality Management System, although technical improvement to the workflow can be as quickly as six to eight months. And finally, for the Quality Management System to be developed, implemented and maintained successfully, Maximisation of Performance objectives, Good Leadership, Motivation of staff, Implementation of Change Management, Employee Involvement, Long-term Top Management Commitment, Provision of Training, Introduction of Quality Improvement Projects, Measuring Quality Management System Progress and Reward Accomplishment, are the fundamental concepts or principles that should be considered.
机译:这项研究是关于员工对南非政府部门之一实施的质量管理体系干预措施效果的看法。该组织的质量管理体系是南非政府或公共部门中第一个要实施的组织,这为将该质量管理体系模型用于开发政府或其他部门或组织的质量管理体系提供了可能性南非和南部非洲地区的公共部门。根据Madu&Kuei(1995)的说法,质量管理体系描述了一种情况,其中所有业务职能都参与了持续质量改进的过程。这意味着在政府部门和公共部门中开发和实施质量管理系统将提高服务提供的质量。这项研究的结果表明,可以使用质量管理系统来提高公共部门的服务水平。质量管理体系应在五个阶段的一段时间内计划开发和实施(i)第1阶段-确定质量管理体系实施范围(ii)第2阶段-培训(iii)第3阶段-程序制定( iv)阶段4 –试点执行程序(v)阶段5 –质量管理体系评估和推出。建立整个组织范围的质量管理体系通常需要三年或三年以上的时间,尽管对工作流程的技术改进可能要花六到八个月的时间。最后,要成功开发,实施和维护质量管理体系,应实现绩效目标的最大化,良好的领导力,员工的积极性,实施变革管理,员工的参与,长期最高管理者的承诺,提供培训,介绍质量改进项目,衡量质量管理体系进度和奖励成就是应考虑的基本概念或原则。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maluleke Yinywane Leon;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号