首页> 外文OA文献 >A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF REFUSALS IN RICHARD LINKLATER’S BOYHOOD
【2h】

A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF REFUSALS IN RICHARD LINKLATER’S BOYHOOD

机译:对健康饮食中拒绝的积极和消极的政治策略的语用分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research aims to identify and describe the kinds of positive and negative politeness strategies of refusals employed in Boyhood and the factor of choosing a certain type of politeness strategy in Boyhood.udThis research employed the descriptive qualitative method. The data were in the form of utterances which contain refusals. The data source was Boyhood movie and its script. There were two instruments of this research: the researcher and the data sheet. The data were collected by doing several steps: watching the movie, checking the accuracy of the dialogue in the movie and the transcript, writing down the refusals delivered by the characters, and recording the data into the data sheet. To ensure the data, a triangulation technique was applied.udThere are two results of this study. The first result is that both of positive and negative politeness strategies are employed by the characters. There are eight sub- strategies of positive politeness that are being applied by the characters: intensifying interest to the hearer, using in-group identity markers, avoiding disagreement, joking, being optimistic that the hearer wants what the speaker wants, including both speaker and hearer in the activity, giving or asking for reasons, and giving gifts to hearer. Negative politeness strategy is realized by questioning and hedging, minimizing the imposition, apologizing, and stating the face threatening act as a general rule. The second result is that all characters in Boyhood consider payoff to be one of the basic factors influencing their choice of performing a certain strategy. The second factor is relevant circumstances which consist of three elements: social distance, relative power, and rank of imposition. This research reveals that positive politeness strategy is employed when the social distance between the speaker and the hearer is close, the relative power between the participants is insignificant, and the rank of imposition is relative small. On the other hand, negative politeness strategy is applied when the rank of imposition is high and the participants have a big difference in terms of social distance and relative power.ududKeyword: pragmatic, positive politeness strategy, negative politeness strategy, refusal, Boyhood
机译:本研究旨在确定和描述童年时代拒绝行为的积极和消极礼貌策略的种类,以及在童年时代选择某种礼貌策略的因素。 ud本研究采用描述性定性方法。数据采用包含拒绝的话语形式。数据源是《少年时代》电影及其脚本。这项研究有两种工具:研究人员和数据表。通过执行以下几个步骤来收集数据:观看电影,检查电影和字幕中对话的准确性,写下角色拒绝的内容以及将数据记录到数据表中。为了确保数据,使用了三角剖分技术。 ud本研究有两个结果。第一个结果是角色同时采用正面和负面礼貌策略。角色采用八个积极礼貌子策略:增强对听众的兴趣,使用组内身份标记,避免分歧,开玩笑,对听众希望说话者想要的东西持乐观态度,包括说话者和活动中的听众,给出或询问原因,并向听众赠送礼物。消极的礼貌策略是通过质疑和对冲,最小化拼大写,道歉和说明威胁面子的行为来实现的。第二个结果是,《少年时代》中的所有角色都认为收益是影响他们选择执行特定策略的基本因素之一。第二个因素是相关情况,它由三个要素组成:社会距离,相对权力和施加的等级。研究表明,当说话者与听者之间的社交距离较近,参与者之间的相对权力微不足道,施加的等级较小时,采用积极的礼貌策略。另一方面,在强加等级较高且参与者在社交距离和相对权力方面有较大差异时,将应用否定礼貌策略。 ud ud关键字:务实,积极礼貌策略,否定礼貌策略,拒绝,少年时代

著录项

  • 作者

    Nur Pratiknyo Kuweira;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号