首页> 外文OA文献 >Rationale and design for SHAREHD: a quality improvement collaborative to scale up Shared Haemodialysis Care for patients on centre based haemodialysis.
【2h】

Rationale and design for SHAREHD: a quality improvement collaborative to scale up Shared Haemodialysis Care for patients on centre based haemodialysis.

机译:sHaREHD的基本原理和设计:为中心血液透析患者提供质量改进协同扩大共享血液透析护理。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: The study objective is to assess the effectiveness and economic impact of a structured programme to support patient involvement in centre-based haemodialysis and to understand what works for whom in what circumstances and why. It implements a program of Shared Haemodialysis Care (SHC) that aims to improve experience and outcomes for those who are treated with centre-based haemodialysis, and give more patients the confidence to dialyse independently both at centres and at home. METHODS/DESIGN: The 24 month mixed methods cohort evaluation of 600 prevalent centre based HD patients is nested within a 30 month quality improvement program that aims to scale up SHC at 12 dialysis centres across England. SHC describes an intervention where patients who receive centre-based haemodialysis are given the opportunity to learn, engage with and undertake tasks associated with their treatment. Following a 6-month set up period, a phased implementation programme is initiated across 12 dialysis units using a randomised stepped wedge design with 6 centres participating in each of 2 steps, each lasting 6 months. The intervention utilises quality improvement methodologies involving rapid tests of change to determine the most appropriate mechanisms for implementation in the context of a learning collaborative. Running parallel with the stepped wedge intervention is a mixed methods cohort evaluation that employs patient questionnaires and interviews, and will link with routinely collected data at the end of the study period. The primary outcome measure is the number of patients performing at least 5 dialysis-related tasks collected using 3 monthly questionnaires. Secondary outcomes measures include: the number of people choosing to perform home haemodialysis or dialyse independently in-centre by the end of the study period; end-user recommendation; home dialysis establishment delay; staff impact and confidence; hospitalisation; infection and health economics. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will provide evidence of impact of SHC, barriers to patient and centre level adoption and inform development of future interventions to support its implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Number: 93999549 , (retrospectively registered 1st May 2017); NIHR Research Portfolio: 31566.
机译:背景:研究目的是评估结构化计划的有效性和经济影响,以支持患者参与中心型血液透析,并了解在什么情况下以及在什么情况下什么对谁有效。它实施了一项共享血液透析护理(SHC)计划,该计划旨在改善那些接受中心血液透析治疗的患者的经验和结果,并使更多患者有信心在中心和家里独立进行透析。方法/设计:将对600名以中心为中心的HD患者进行24个月混合方法队列评估,该评估嵌套在一个为期30个月的质量改进计划中,该计划旨在扩大英格兰12个透析中心的SHC。 SHC描述了一种干预措施,在该干预措施中,接受中心血液透析的患者将有机会学习,参与并执行与其治疗相关的任务。在为期6个月的设置期后,将使用随机阶梯楔形设计在12个透析单元中启动分阶段实施计划,每个阶段有6个中心参与2个步骤,每个中心持续6个月。干预利用质量改进方法论,该方法论涉及快速的变更测试,以确定在学习协作的情况下最合适的实施机制。与阶梯式楔形干预并行进行的是一项混合方法队列评估,采用患者问卷和访谈,并将在研究期末与常规收集的数据联系起来。主要结果指标是使用3份每月调查表收集的至少执行5项与透析相关任务的患者人数。次要结局指标包括:到研究期结束时选择独立进行家庭血液透析或透析的人数。最终用户推荐;家庭透析建立延迟;对员工的影响和信心;住院;感染和卫生经济学。讨论:这项研究的结果将提供SHC的影响,患者和中心级采用的障碍的证据,并为将来的干预措施的发展提供支持。试用注册号:ISRCTN编号:93999549,(追溯注册于2017年5月1日); NIHR研究组合:31566。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号