首页> 外文OA文献 >Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses
【2h】

Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses

机译:工程课程教学创新

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background The ability to engage in a creative process to solve a problem or to design a novel artifact is essential to engineering as a profession. Research indicates a need for curricula that enhance students' creative skills in engineering. Purpose Our purpose was to document current practices in engineering pedagogy with regard to opportunities for students' creative growth by examining learning goals, instructional methods, and assessments focused on cognitive creative skills. Design/Method We conducted a critical case study of engineering pedagogy at a single university with seven engineering courses where instructors stated the goal of fostering creativity. Data included instructor and student interviews, student surveys, and course materials. For qualitative analysis, we used frameworks by Treffinger, Young, Selby, and Shepardson and by Wiggins and McTighe. Results One aspect of creativity, convergent thinking (including analysis and evaluation), was well represented in the engineering courses in our case study. However, instruction on generating ideas and openness to exploring ideas was less often evident. For many of the creative skills, especially those related to divergent thinking and idea exploration, assessments were lacking. Conclusions An analysis of pedagogy focused on goals, instruction, and assessments in the engineering curriculum revealed opportunities for growth in students' creative skill development. Designing assessments that motivate students to improve their creative skills and to become more aware of their own creative process is a key need in engineering pedagogy.
机译:背景技术从事创造性过程以解决问题或设计新颖工件的能力对于工程专业至关重要。研究表明,需要课程来提高学生的工程学创造力。目的我们的目的是通过检查学习目标,教学方法和侧重于认知创造力的评估,来记录工程教育学中有关学生创造力发展机会的当前实践。设计/方法我们在一所大学开设了七个工程课程,对工程教育学进行了关键案例研究,其中讲师指出了培养创造力的目标。数据包括教师和学生访谈,学生调查和课程资料。对于定性分析,我们使用了Treffinger,Young,Selby和Shepardson以及Wiggins和McTighe的框架。结果在我们的案例研究中,工程学课程很好地体现了创造力的一个方面,即融合思想(包括分析和评估)。但是,关于产生想法和对想法进行开放的指导很少见。对于许多创造力,尤其是与思维和思想探索分歧有关的创造力,缺乏评估。结论对工程学课程中目标,指导和评估的教学法进行的分析揭示了学生创造技能发展的机会。设计评估以激发学生提高其创造力并更加了解他们自己的创造过程的评估是工程学教学法中的关键需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号