首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Materials for Science and Engineering >Engineering teaching courses leading-in creativity which demands teaching situation and element analysis
【24h】

Engineering teaching courses leading-in creativity which demands teaching situation and element analysis

机译:工科教学课程引入创造力需要教学情况和要素分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the era of industry 4.0, students not only need to cater to the needs of customers but also need to achieve the goal of integrating industrial skills with sales and products experience. It also helps to build up the complete adaptability, efficiency of resource and smart factory of human factors and ergonomics. As the result, there is a huge change of education in the field of engineering. Systematic cultivation of theory of innovation thinking and the practical application would be valued. Thus, this research chose the engineering students from one of the famous universities in Taiwan as the objects of study and also chose three courses of the college as the research samples. This research aimed at qualitative analyzing by doing in-depth interview and class observation to examine the teachers' teaching, students' learning attitudes and the arrangement of courses. According to this research suggests that there are two parts of the characters of teachers' teaching and students' learning of the college of engineering. First, teachers from engineering fields still focus on the outcome of `power of operation', thus, teachers especially emphasize on logics and `elaboration'. Furthermore, they regard students' `internal interests' is the top condition of learning. Second, the characters of the students from the college of engineering put stress on learning knowledge and skill systematically. Brainstorming and skill integration of project are developed in the end. Although the students show the positive attitudes of solving problems, it is hard for them to present the achievements of the course in finite time. As the result, this research suggests the adaptability and supporting measures of leading Three-Capacity to courses to advance the efficiency. In basic engineering courses and experimental courses, students need to learn basic concepts and skill; therefore, teachers have to provide the students with concrete practical teaching materials and proper materials and guide them to observe, thinking, present and lead creative thinking to courses. The advanced courses of engineering belong to be practical learning. To make students get rid of the old way that learning systematically and guide them to think creatively and integrate what they learn, teachers adopt unit-oriented teaching with creativity methods to be one of the characters of guidance of engineering teaching.
机译:在工业4.0时代,学生不仅需要满足客户的需求,还需要实现将工业技能与销售和产品经验相结合的目标。它还有助于建立完整的适应性,资源效率以及人为因素和人机工程学的智能工厂。结果,工程领域的教育发生了巨大变化。系统地培养创新思维理论及其实际应用价值。因此,本研究选择了台湾一所著名大学的工科学生作为研究对象,并选择了该学院的三门课程作为研究样本。本研究旨在通过进行深入的访谈和课堂观察来定性分析,以检验教师的教学,学生的学习态度和课程安排。根据这项研究表明,工科大学的教师教学和学生学习有两个特点。首先,工程领域的教师仍将重点放在“操作力”的结果上,因此,教师特别强调逻辑和“详尽”。此外,他们认为学生的“内在兴趣”是学习的首要条件。其次,工学院学生的性格强调系统地学习知识和技能。最后进行了项目集思广益和技能整合。尽管学生表现出解决问题的积极态度,但他们很难在有限的时间内展示该课程的成果。结果,本研究提出了将“三能力”引导到课程以提高效率的适应性和支持措施。在基础工程课程和实验课程中,学生需要学习基本概念和技能;因此,教师必须为学生提供具体的实用教学材料和适当的材料,并指导他们观察,思考,呈现和引导创造性思维进入课程。工程学的高级课程属于实践学习。为了使学生摆脱古老的系统学习方式,引导他们进行创造性思维和整合所学知识,教师采用单元式教学和创造性方法,成为工程教学指导的特点之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号