首页> 外文OA文献 >Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection
【2h】

Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection

机译:公交导向发展中的通勤方式选择:区分竞争社区,出行态度和自我选择的影响

摘要

This research identifies the commuting mode choice behaviour of 3537 adults living in different typesudof transit oriented development (TOD) in Brisbane by disentangling the effects of their “evil twin”udtransit adjacent developments (TADs), and by also controlling for residential self-selection, traveludattitudes and preferences, and socio-demographic effects. A TwoStep cluster analysis was conductedudto identify the natural groupings of respondents’ living environment based on six built environmentudindicators. The analysis resulted in five types of neighbourhoods: urban TODs, activity centre TODs,udpotential TODs, TADs, and traditional suburbs. HABITAT survey data were used to derive theudcommute mode choice behaviour of people living in these neighbourhoods. In addition, statementsudreflecting both respondents’ travel attitudes and living preferences were also collected as part of theudsurvey. Factor analyses were conducted based on these statements and these derived factors wereudthen used to control for residential self-selection. Four binary logistic regression models wereudestimated, one for each of the travel modes used (e.g. public transport, active transport, lessudsustainable transport such as the car/taxi, and other), to differentiate between the commutingudbehaviour of people living in the five types of neighbourhoods. The findings verify that urban TODsudenhance the use of public transport and reduce car usage. No significant difference was found in theudcommuting behaviour between respondents living in traditional suburbs and TADs. The resultsudconfirm the hypothesis that TADs are the “evil twin” of TODs. The data indicates that TADs and theudmode choices of residents in these neighbourhoods is a missed transport policy opportunity. Furtherudpolicy efforts are required for a successive transition of TADs into TODs in order to realise the fulludbenefits of these. TOD policy should also be integrated with context specific TOD design principles.
机译:这项研究通过区分“邪恶双胞胎” udtransit邻近开发区(TADs)的影响,并控制住户自我,确定了3537名生活在布里斯班不同类型 udof面向公交开发(TOD)的成年人的通勤模式选择行为选择,旅行大胆和偏爱以及社会人口统计学影响。进行了两步聚类分析,以根据六个内置环境/指标来确定受访者生活环境的自然分组。分析得出了五种类型的社区:城市TOD,活动中心TOD,潜在TOD,TAD和传统郊区。 HABITAT调查数据用于得出居住在这些社区的人的 udmute模式选择行为。此外,还收集了反映受访者旅行态度和生活偏好的表述,作为表述的一部分。基于这些陈述进行因子分析,然后将这些衍生因子用于控制住宅的自我选择。估算估算了四种二元逻辑回归模型,每种模型分别用于所使用的每种出行方式(例如,公共交通工具,主动交通工具,不太可持续的交通工具,例如汽车/出租车等),以区分居住人群的通勤行为在五种类型的社区中。研究结果证实,城市TOD能够加强公共交通的使用并减少汽车的使用。生活在传统郊区的受访者与TAD之间的通勤行为没有显着差异。结果证实了以下假设:TAD是TOD的“邪恶孪生”。数据表明,这些社区中的TAD和居民的 udmode选择是错过的交通政策机会。为了实现TAD到TOD的连续过渡,还需要进一步的 udpolicial努力,以实现它们的全部 udenefits。 TOD政策还应该与特定于上下文的TOD设计原则相结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号