Practical legal training has traditionally been the poor relation of the legal education family. Along with the similarly placed clinical legal education, it is a latecomer to formal legal education and its academic value is regarded with some reservation by those involved in more mainstream areas of academia. These reservations are not entirely unfounded. While few could deny the value of practical legal training in terms of teaching and contribution to the legal community, it is in the contribution to research and scholarship that practical legal training may be seen to be less successful. Few academics who teach in practical legal training go on to conduct research into it, external funding opportunities in this area are quite limited and such research as is conducted is not perceived to have a high academic value.ududThis paper draws on a research project conducted by the writers to explore the climate influencing research in practical legal training and the standards by which its research successes are measured. The paper relies on interview data obtained from PLT academics to ascertain obstacles to research in PLT and to postulate how positive outcomes for valuing practical legal training research might be achieved.
展开▼
机译:传统上,实践法律培训一直是法律教育家庭的不良关系。与放置类似的临床法律教育一样,它是正规法律教育的后起之秀,学术界更为主流领域的人们对它的学术价值有所保留。这些保留并非完全没有根据。虽然很少有人会否认实践法律培训在教学和对法律界的贡献方面的价值,但正是由于对研究和学术的贡献,实践法律培训才被认为不太成功。很少有从事实践法律培训的学者继续进行研究,这方面的外部资金机会非常有限,所进行的研究未被认为具有很高的学术价值。 ud ud本文借鉴了一项研究作者进行的该项目,旨在探索在法律实践培训中影响气候的研究以及衡量其研究成功的标准。本文依靠从PLT学者那里获得的访谈数据来确定PLT研究的障碍,并提出如何实现评估实用法律培训研究的积极成果。
展开▼