首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements
【2h】

Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements

机译:空间频率对快速和慢速阅读器识别单词的影响:来自眼动的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent research has shown that differences in the effectiveness of spatial frequencies for fast and slow skilled adult readers may be an important component of differences in reading ability in the skilled adult reading population (Jordan et al., 2016a). But the precise nature of this influence on lexical processing during reading remains to be fully determined. Accordingly, to gain more insight into the use of spatial frequencies by skilled adult readers with fast and slow reading abilities, the present study looked at effects of spatial frequencies on the processing of specific target words in sentences. These target words were of either high or low lexical frequency and each sentence was displayed as normal or filtered to contain only very low, low, medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. Eye movement behavior for target words was closest to normal for each reading ability when text was shown in medium or higher spatial frequency displays, although reading occurred for all spatial frequencies. Moreover, typical word frequency effects (the processing advantage for words with higher lexical frequencies) were observed for each reading ability across a broad range of spatial frequencies, indicating that many different spatial frequencies provide access to lexical representations during textual reading for both fast and slow skilled adult readers. Crucially, however, target word fixations were fewer and shorter for fast readers than for slow readers for all display types, and this advantage for fast readers appeared to be similar for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies but larger for low and very low spatial frequencies. Therefore, although fast and slow skilled adult readers can both use a broad range of spatial frequencies when reading, fast readers make more effective use of these spatial frequencies, and especially those that are lower, when processing the identities of words.
机译:最近的研究表明,快和慢速成年读者的空间频率有效性差异可能是成年成年阅读人群阅读能力差异的重要组成部分(Jordan等人,2016a)。但是,这种影响阅读过程中词汇处理的确切性质尚待完全确定。因此,为了获得对具有快速和慢速阅读能力的成年读者的空间频率使用的更多了解,本研究着眼于空间频率对句子中特定目标词处理的影响。这些目标词的词汇频率很高或很低,每个句子显示为正常或已过滤,只包含非常低,非常低,中等,很高或非常高的空间频率。当文本以中等或更高的空间频率显示时,目标单词的眼动行为对于每种阅读能力而言都最接近正常状态,尽管在所有空间频率下都会发生阅读。此外,在广泛的空间频率范围内,每种阅读能力都观察到典型的词频效应(具有较高词法频率的词的处理优势),这表明在文本阅读期间,无论快还是慢,许多不同的空间频率都可以访问词法表示熟练的成人读者。但是,至关重要的是,对于所有显示类型,快速阅读器的目标词固定比慢速阅读器的固定和更少,并且对于普通,中,高和非常高的空间频率,快速阅读器的优势似乎相似,而对于低和低的阅读器,则更大。非常低的空间频率。因此,尽管速度快和速度慢的成年读者都可以在阅读时使用宽范围的空间频率,但是快速阅读者在处理单词的标识时可以更有效地利用这些空间频率,尤其是较低频率的空间频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号