首页> 外文OA文献 >Vision for Tertiary Education Under Free Market Policies: A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Tertiary Education Policy of Zambia and New Zealand
【2h】

Vision for Tertiary Education Under Free Market Policies: A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Tertiary Education Policy of Zambia and New Zealand

机译:自由市场政策下的高等教育愿景:赞比亚和新西兰当代高等教育政策的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the past two decades economic theories of the 'market' have permeated economic and social sector policies of both developed and developing countries. Market mechanisms have become the main policy option upon which economic and social sector reforms, including tertiary education, have been premised. In this study I have compared trends in contemporary tertiary education policy of two countries: Zambia and New Zealand. Prior to 1980 in both countries education was predominantly a public monopoly and free at all levels. However, in the late 1980s and early 1990s New Zealand and Zambia respectively embarked on radical economic and social sector reforms based on the competitive market model. I have argued that market mechanisms in education policy of both Zambia and New Zealand had their origins in economic theories of the competitive market. These theories gained popularity at a time when countries were going through unprecedented economic difficulties. Thus, although on the surface competitive market policies would seem to suggest that the aim of government was to improve efficiency and accountability and to increase equity and equality of opportunities in tertiary institutions, under conditions of increasing demand on declining public resources and at a time when demand for tertiary education was increasing, it would appear that the long-term intentions of governments in both countries were to reduce public appropriation to tertiary education by transferring part of the responsibility of funding education to institutions themselves and to the beneficiaries of tertiary education. I have also argued that because New Zealand already had a prolific education system in place and a comprehensive student support system it was in a better position to operate its tertiary education system along free market lines. An under-developed tertiary education sector and lack of comprehensive student-aid packages in Zambia have meant that the implementation of market-oriented policies in tertiary education are likely to impact more negatively on the students, education institutions and Zambian society in general.
机译:在过去的二十年中,“市场”的经济理论已经渗透到发达国家和发展中国家的经济和社会部门政策中。市场机制已成为经济和社会部门改革(包括高等教育)的前提的主要政策选择。在这项研究中,我比较了赞比亚和新西兰这两个国家当代高等教育政策的趋势。在1980年之前,两国的教育主要是公共垄断,各级教育都是免费的。但是,在1980年代末和1990年代初,新西兰和赞比亚分别基于竞争性市场模型着手进行激进的经济和社会部门改革。我认为,赞比亚和新西兰的教育政策市场机制都源于竞争性市场的经济理论。这些理论在各国正经历着前所未有的经济困难之时得到普及。因此,尽管从表面上看,竞争性市场政策似乎表明政府的目的是提高效率和问责制,并在对公共资源不断减少的需求不断增加的情况下以及在这种情况下,提高大专院校的机会均等和平等性。高等教育的需求在增加,这两个国家的政府的长期意图似乎是通过将部分教育经费责任转移给机构本身和高等教育受益者,以减少公共对高等教育的拨款。我还争辩说,由于新西兰已经建立了一个多产的教育体系和一个全面的学生支持体系,因此它可以更好地按照自由市场路线来运作其高等教育体系。高等教育部门不发达,赞比亚缺乏全面的学生援助计划,这意味着在高等教育中实施以市场为导向的政策可能会对学生,教育机构和整个赞比亚社会产生更大的负面影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mbita Allan Kalapa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号