首页> 外文OA文献 >Conceptual metaphors and the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association:Construction of knowledge, discourse communities and internationalization
【2h】

Conceptual metaphors and the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association:Construction of knowledge, discourse communities and internationalization

机译:概念隐喻与日本认知语言学协会:知识,话语社区和国际化的建构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article discusses the socio-cultural constitution of reality and metaphors in general and the case of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association (JCLA) as well as its international relations in particular. It aims at contributing to cognitive linguistics and metaphor research by presenting and analyzing the JCLA and its metaphor discourse from 2001 to 2010. After a short introduction to cognitive linguistics and conceptual metaphors this article therefore mainly investigates the following research questions: How is the JCLA integrated into the international context? Which are the thematic key issues in the JCLA’s metaphor discourse and are there specialized sub-discourses? How is knowledge (and thus reality) constructed, via which methods? Who are the main actors, who is at the center of the discourse, who has discursive power, and how is the discourse community organized? The main results of the discourse analysis of 58 selected JCLA conference articles include a typology of six specialized discourses and principal argumentation patterns such as data, exemplum and authority topos, corresponding to the six sub-discourses. Regarding discursive power, almost all of the analyzed discourse texts refer to Lakoff and Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory, emphasizing the international influence on the JCLA metaphor research. However, concerning the sub-discourses, one finds smaller specialized discourse communities of Japanese scholars.
机译:本文讨论了现实和隐喻的社会文化构成,以及日本认知语言协会(JCLA)的情况,尤其是其国际关系。它旨在通过介绍和分析2001年至2010年的JCLA及其隐喻话语,为认知语言学和隐喻研究做出贡献。因此,在简要介绍认知语言学和概念隐喻之后,本文主要研究以下研究问题:JCLA如何整合进入国际环境? JCLA的隐喻话语中哪些主题关键问题?专业子语中有哪些?如何通过哪些方法来构造知识(从而现实)?谁是主要角色,谁是话语的中心,谁拥有话语权,话语社区如何组织?对58篇JCLA会议论文的话语分析的主要结果包括六个专业话语的类型学以及与六个子话语相对应的主要论证模式,例如数据,范例和对主题的授权。关于话语权,几乎所有已分析的话语文本都引用了拉科夫和约翰逊的概念隐喻理论,强调了国际上对JCLA隐喻研究的影响。但是,关于子话语,人们发现了日本学者规模较小的专业话语社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tanke Sarah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号