首页> 外文OA文献 >Het gebruik van prestatie-informatie binnen publieke organisaties. Een onderzoek naar de doelstellingen en (vormen van) gebruik van prestatie-informatie binnen de lagere overheden
【2h】

Het gebruik van prestatie-informatie binnen publieke organisaties. Een onderzoek naar de doelstellingen en (vormen van) gebruik van prestatie-informatie binnen de lagere overheden

机译:在公共组织中使用绩效信息。对地方当局内部绩效信息的目标和使用形式的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Use of Performance Information in Public OrganizationsA study on the purposes and (forms of) use of performance information in local governmentName student:Remko VonkStudent ID: 850495678 Faculty: Management SciencesDate:March, 2014ABSTRACTPurpose: The most crucial indicator for whether measuring performance information is worth the effort, is whether public managers are using performance information (Moynihan, 2010).A better understanding about the purposes and uses of performance information in smaller Dutch municipalities can contribute to better use of performance information in Public organizations. The purpose of this research is to contribute to the theory of De Lancer Julnes (2008) about the purposes and uses of performance information in Public organizations.Design/methodology/approach: The central question of this research is: “What purposes and uses of performance information can be distinguished in the actual use of performance information by officials and managers in the local government?”Four types of purposes (accountability, improvement, understanding, mobilization) and five types of knowledge uses (reassurance, compliance, program learning, enlightment, legitimization) where formulated for the use of performance information.Data was collected through a case study. The study was conducted at a Dutch small municipality. Information was collected through semi-constructed interviews and also through content analyzes of important documents. Results are classified in the 4 purposes and 5 knowledge uses for using performance information, as formulated by De Lancer Julnes (2008).Findings: some research findings are:•This empirical study shows that councilors distinguish the purposes accountability, improvement and mobilization from the following reports i.e. the progress report, the list of central planning and the internal control report; •The study shows further that managers recognize the same purposes from these reports. It is striking that both the councilors and the managers do not experience the purpose understanding. My research has not revealed why in the municipality of Epe this purpose is not experienced; •In addition, it appears from this research that the councilors distinguish from the same reports the use of the form reassurance, compliance, legitimacy and program learning. It also follows from this research that managers identify from these reports the uses reassurance, compliance, legitimacy and learning. It is striking that both councilors and managers don’t experience the form enlightment. My research has not revealed why in the municipality of Epe this form is not experienced; •The research shows that the following combinations accountability - reassurance, improve - compliance, mobilization - legitimacy, accountability – compliance and improve - learn are recognized in the actual use of performance information in the municipality of Epe. Research limitations/implications: The generalizability of this study is limited, because of the chosen methodology (single case study). Originality/value: The need of more research on the use of performance information is justified by the appeal in the literature. Moynihan et al (2010) argues that governments have used a large part of their energy and resources to create Performance Information Systems, there is still too little research into the use of this information and this must change according to Moynihan (2010) . Also in the literature there are many quantitative researches of the uses of performance information. Less qualitative research has been done. Qualitative research in specific sectors in the public sector can contribute to better use of performance information in Public organizations. This research is a modest contribution to the theory formulated by De Lancer Julnes (2008) and it learns us how performance information is used by a small Dutch municipality, which needs to be further investigated in more Dutch municipalities.Keywords: performance management, performance measurement, performance information, De Lancer Julnes, principal agent theory, Public Organization, Dutch municipality.
机译:公共组织中绩效信息的使用有关地方政府绩效信息的目的和使用形式的研究姓名学生:Remko Vonk学生ID:850495678学院:管理科学日期:2014年3月ABSTRACT目的:衡量绩效信息是否最关键的指标值得努力的是公共管理者是否正在使用绩效信息(Moynihan,2010年)。在较小的荷兰市政当局中更好地了解绩效信息的目的和用途可以有助于公共组织更好地使用绩效信息。这项研究的目的是为De Lancer Julnes(2008)关于公共组织绩效信息的目的和用途的理论做出贡献。设计/方法/方法:这项研究的中心问题是:绩效信息可以由地方政府的官员和经理在实际使用绩效信息中加以区分吗?”四种目的(问责制,改进,理解,动员)和五种知识用途(保证,合规,计划学习,启发) (合法化),以便为绩效信息的使用而制定。通过案例研究收集数据。该研究是在荷兰的一个小城市进行的。信息是通过半构造式采访以及重要文件的内容分析来收集的。结果由De Lancer Julnes(2008)定义为使用绩效信息的4个目的和5个知识用途。研究发现:一些研究发现:•这项实证研究表明,理事们将目的责任,改进和动员与遵循报告,即进度报告,中央计划清单和内部控制报告; •研究进一步表明,经理们从这些报告中认识到了相同的目的。令人惊讶的是,理事和管理人员都没有对目标的理解。我的研究没有揭示为什么在埃佩自治市没有达到这个目的。 •此外,从这项研究中可以看出,委员与同一份报告区别对待使用形式保证,遵从性,合法性和计划学习。从这项研究中还可以得出结论,管理人员从这些报告中可以确定使用的保证,合规性,合法性和学习性。令人惊讶的是,理事和管理人员都没有经历过启蒙运动。我的研究没有揭示为什么在埃佩自治市没有这种经历。 •研究表明,在Epe市实际使用绩效信息时,公认的责任-保证,提高-遵守,动员-合法性,责任-遵从和改善-学习相结合。研究的局限性/意义:由于选择的方法(单一案例研究),本研究的可概括性受到限制。独创性/价值:文献中的吸引力证明有必要对性能信息的使用进行更多研究。 Moynihan等人(2010年)认为,政府已将其大部分能源和资源用于创建绩效信息系统,但对此类信息的使用的研究仍很少,根据Moynihan(2010年),这必须改变。在文献中也有许多关于绩效信息使用的定量研究。较少的定性研究已经完成。公共部门特定部门的定性研究可以有助于更好地利用公共组织的绩效信息。这项研究对De Lancer Julnes(2008)提出的理论做出了适度的贡献,它向我们学习了荷兰的一个小型市政当局如何使用绩效信息,这需要在更多的荷兰市政当局中进一步研究。 ,绩效信息,De Lancer Julnes,首席代理人理论,荷兰市政当局。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vonk RM;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 nl
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号