首页> 外文OA文献 >Het gebruik van prestatie-informatie binnen publieke organisaties. Een onderzoek naar de doelstellingen en vormen van gebruik van prestatie-informatie bij de Koninklijke Luchtmacht
【2h】

Het gebruik van prestatie-informatie binnen publieke organisaties. Een onderzoek naar de doelstellingen en vormen van gebruik van prestatie-informatie bij de Koninklijke Luchtmacht

机译:在公共组织中使用绩效信息。荷兰皇家空军对性能信息的目标和用途的调查

摘要

To design and implement a performance measurement system is one thing, making sure that the system is actually being used is something different (De Lancer Julnes & Holzer, 2001). Research shows that performance reports are often not being used by politicians and (senior) management (Van Dooren & Van de Walle, 2008). On top of that, other sources of information are being used in the accountability and control processes. In practice, design and implementation on the one hand and actual use on the other are not aligned. Also, the term “usage” has not been defined objective and precise between controlling and being accountable. This research tries to find a relationship between the predetermined goals of performance measurement and the actual use of performance information in public organizations. The central question is:What forms of use of performance information can be distinguished in public organizations and how are they related to the determined design objectives of the performance measurement system?In this research a conceptual model has been created relating goals of performance reports with forms of use. The goals of performance reports as they appear in literature and being used in this research are (Behn, 2003):•Evaluate;•Control;•Budget;•Motivate;•Promote;•Celebrate;•Learn;•Improve.Performance information is not always being used explicitly in decision making, but is considered a cognitive process (Kroll, 2011). The use of performance reports has not been defined objective and precise (Van Dooren & Van de Walle, 2008). Based on the different theories of performance reports (Jansen, 2008; Kroll, 2012; Moynihan, 2009; Van Dooren & Van de Walle, 2008) in this research the next forms of use have been identified: direct use for controlling, direct use for being accountable, indirect use as background information, indirect use in addition to other performance information and indirect use as a trigger for further research.An exploratory and descriptive research has been executed by means of a case study to establish the relationships between the goals of performance reporting and the form of use. The research has been conducted in three cases in the Royal Netherlands Air Force. The first case is the Commander of the Royal Netherlands Air Force and the goals and forms of use of performance measurement he envisions. The second and third case are operational units, subordinate to the Commander of the Royal Netherlands Air Force: Eindhoven Air Base and the Royal Netherlands Air Force Training Command on Woensdrecht Air Base. Members of the management team of each case have been interviewed through semi-structured interviews.Research shows that control is the dominant goal in the performance reporting. The goals budget, motivate, promote, celebrate, learn and improve are less present. Evaluate has not appeared in the research. Direct use for being accountable proves to be the most important form of use. Indirect forms of use (background information, addition to other performance information and a trigger for further research) come to a lesser extent. Furthermore these forms of use seem to be depending on the individual. Direct use for controlling does not appear in the research. The goal of performance reporting (control) is directly related to the form of use (direct use for being accountable).This research comes to the conclusion that in the Royal Netherlands Air Force one goal is the basis for the performance reports. The design of the performance reports is well defined. Other attainable goals are not taken into account as a consequence of this demarcation. The effectiveness of the performance reporting process could be improved if other goals are being considered when redefining the performance reporting process. The same goes for the forms of use of performance reports. The research shows an interest to address the other goals as well as a broader form of use of performance reports.
机译:设计和实施性能评估系统是一回事,要确保该系统实际使用是不同的(De Lancer Julnes&Holzer,2001)。研究表明,政绩人员和(高级)管理人员通常不使用绩效报告(Van Dooren和Van de Walle,2008年)。最重要的是,在问责制和控制流程中还使用了其他信息来源。在实践中,一方面设计和实现与另一方面的实际使用不一致。同样,术语“使用”还没有在控制和问责之间客观和精确地定义。这项研究试图发现绩效评估的预定目标与公共组织中绩效信息的实际使用之间的关系。中心问题是:在公共组织中可以区分哪种形式的绩效信息使用?它们与绩效衡量系统确定的设计目标有何关系?在本研究中,我们创建了一个概念模型,将绩效报告的目标与形式相关联使用。绩效报告出现在文献中并在本研究中使用的目标是(Behn,2003):•评估;•控制;•预算;•激励;•促进;•庆祝;•学习;•改进。绩效信息是并非总是明确地用于决策过程,而是被认为是认知过程(Kroll,2011年)。绩效报告的使用还没有被定义为客观和准确的(Van Dooren&Van de Walle,2008)。根据绩效报告的不同理论(Jansen,2008; Kroll,2012; Moynihan,2009; Van Dooren和Van de Walle,2008),确定了以下使用形式:直接用于控制,直接用于控制负责任,间接用作背景信息,除其他绩效信息以外的间接使用以及间接用作进一步研究的触发因素。已通过案例研究进行探索性和描述性研究,以建立绩效目标之间的关系报告和使用形式。这项研究已在荷兰皇家空军的三个案例中进行。第一个案例是荷兰皇家空军的指挥官,以及他设想的性能测量的目标和形式。第二和第三种情况是作战单位,隶属于荷兰皇家空军司令官:埃因霍温空军基地和荷兰皇家空军训练司令部在Woensdrecht空军基地。每个案例的管理团队成员均经过半结构化访谈。研究表明,控制是绩效报告的主要目标。预算,激励,促进,庆祝,学习和改进的目标很少出现。评价尚未出现在研究中。直接使用负责任的行为被证明是最重要的使用形式。间接使用形式(背景信息,其他性能信息的补充和引发进一步研究的动机)的程度较小。此外,这些使用形式似乎取决于个人。直接用于控制没有出现在研究中。绩效报告(控制)的目标与使用形式(负责使用的直接使用)直接相关。本研究得出的结论是,在荷兰皇家空军,一个目标是绩效报告的基础。绩效报告的设计是明确定义的。由于此划分,未考虑其他可达到的目标。如果在重新定义绩效报告过程时考虑其他目标,则可以提高绩效报告过程的有效性。绩效报告的使用形式也是如此。研究表明,有兴趣解决其他目标以及使用绩效报告的广泛形式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ha van der R;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 nl
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号