首页> 外文OA文献 >Effective primary pedagogical strategies in English and mathematics in key stage 2: a study of year 5 classroom practiceudfrom the EPPSE 3-16udlongitudinal study
【2h】

Effective primary pedagogical strategies in English and mathematics in key stage 2: a study of year 5 classroom practiceudfrom the EPPSE 3-16udlongitudinal study

机译:关键阶段2:英语和数学的有效主要教学策略:五年级课堂实践研究 ud来自EPPSE 3-16 ud纵向研究

摘要

The Effective Provision of Pre-School, Primary and Secondary Education (EPPSE 3-16)udproject is a large scale, longitudinal, mixed-method research study that has followed theudprogress of 3000+ children since 1997 from the age of 3 to 16+ years.udA continuing question for EPPSE was whether pre- and primary school experiences orudchildren's early home learning environment (HLE) could reduce inequality. While the originaludstudies found that parents' socio-economic status (SES) and qualifications were significantlyudrelated to child outcomes, they also found that the quality of the early HLE was importantud(Melhuish et al., 2008; Sammons et al, 2004). Also important, and particularly relevant to thisudstudy, was the extent to which educational influences (pre-school and primary school qualityudand effectiveness) also shaped children’s educational outcomes. These reports wereudpublished as ‘Variations in Teacher and Pupil Behaviours in Year 5 Classrooms’ (Sammonsudet al, 2006) and ‘The Influences of Teaching Quality on Children’s Progress in PrimaryudSchool’ (Sammons et al., 2008).udThis earlier research found that overall teaching quality is a significant predictor of betterudcognitive progress for children, and specific aspects of classroom processes were found toudpredict both better cognitive progress and social/behavioural development. For example,udhigher levels of disorganisation were related to poorer progress in Reading and Mathematicsudand increased hyperactivity and quality of pedagogy showed a strong relationship withudchildren’s progress in Mathematics (Sammons et al., 2008).udSince educational influences are mainly exerted through teaching, this suggested that an indepthudevaluation of the pedagogical strategies used in the schools involved would be of bothudpolicy and practitioner interest. This study provides greater insights into effective primaryudpedagogical strategies in English and Maths.udPedagogy is a contentious term (see Ko & Sammons, 2010). Our definition is:udInstructional techniques and strategies which enable learning to take place. Itudrefers to the interactive process between teacher/practitioner and learner, andudit is also applied to include the provision of some aspects of the learningudenvironment (including the concrete learning environment, and the actions ofudthe family and community). (Siraj-Blatchford et al., 2002)udEffectiveness is another controversial term. In educational effectiveness research the focusudis on the teacher or school’s contribution to pupil progress (Teddlie and Reynolds, 2000)udMelhuish et al (2006:4) argued that:udPrimary schools where children make significantly greater progress thanudpredicted on the basis of prior attainment and intake characteristics can beudviewed as more effective (positive outliers in value added terms). Primaryudschools where children make less progress than predicted can be viewed asudless effective (negative outliers in value added terms).udThis study explores the associations between value added measures of school effectivenessudand variations in pedagogy.
机译:有效提供学前,小学和中学教育(EPPSE 3-16) udproject是一项大规模,纵向,混合方法的研究,自1997年以来,该研究从3岁到2000年超过3000名儿童16岁以上。 udpEPPSE的一个持续问题是学前和小学的经历或 ud儿童的早期家庭学习环境(HLE)是否可以减少不平等现象。虽然最初的研究发现,父母的社会经济地位(SES)和学历与孩子的结局有显着的 udd,但他们还发现,早期HLE的质量很重要 ud(Melhuish等,2008; Sammons等等,2004)。同样重要的,尤其是与此研究相关的是,教育影响力(学前和小学质量 udand效果)在多大程度上影响了儿童的教育成果。这些报告被发表为“五年级教室中教师和学生行为的变化”(Sammons udet等人,2006年)和“教学质量对儿童小学学习进度的影响”(Sammons等人,2008年)。 ud这项较早的研究发现,总体教学质量是儿童更好的认知发展的重要预测指标,并且发现课堂过程的某些方面可以预测更好的认知发展和社会/行为发展。例如,较高的杂乱程度与阅读和数学的进展较慢有关 ud以及活动过度和教学法质量的提高与儿童在数学方面的进步密切相关(Sammons等人,2008)。 ud由于受教育的影响主要是通过教学发挥作用,这表明对所涉及学校所采用的教学策略的深入低估将具有政治和实践者的兴趣。这项研究为英语和数学中有效的主要 udpedagogical策略提供了更深刻的见解。 udPedagogy是一个有争议的术语(请参阅Ko&Sammons,2010)。我们的定义是: ud使学习得以发生的教学技术和策略。它指的是教师/从业者与学习者之间的互动过程,并且还被认为包括提供学习/环境的某些方面(包括具体的学习环境以及家庭和社区的行动)。 (Siraj-Blatchford et al。,2002) ud有效性是另一个有争议的术语。在教育效能研究中,重点放在教师或学校对学生进步的贡献上(Teddlie and Reynolds,2000) udMelhuish et al(2006:4)认为: ud小学儿童的进步远大于 u可以将先前达到的水平和摄入量的特征视为更有效的(以附加值表示的异常值)。儿童进步不及预期的小学 udud学校可以被视为 udud有效性(在增值方面为负的异常值)。 ud这项研究探讨了学校效果的增值措施 udd与教学法变化之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号