首页> 外文OA文献 >Data-analyse en wiskundige modellering van de initiatie van coronalemassa-ejecties
【2h】

Data-analyse en wiskundige modellering van de initiatie van coronalemassa-ejecties

机译:冠状物质抛射的数据分析和数学建模

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is widely accepted that solar flares and CoronalMass Ejections (CMEs) are magnetically dominated phenomena. Among the various energy sources, only the magnetic one can account for the energy requirements of such violent phenomena. It is also generally accepted that the magnetic energy necessary to drive a solar eruption should be stored in the electric currents, that lead to a non-potentialmagnetic field configuration. However, how this energy is built up into the corona and under which conditions it is suddenly released at a later stage, is not clear yet. Therefore, to better understand the dynamics of these solar eruptions, joined observational and theoretical research efforts are required. In this PhD project, we combined data analysis of solar images with advanced mathematical modeling in order to improve our understanding of such violent phenomena that are the major drivers of the space weather.Starting from the results obtained by van der Holst et al. (2007), we investigated the response of the solar corona when different driving mechanismsare applied as time-dependent boundary conditions. We performed axisymmetric numerical Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations using the Versatile Advection Code (VAC) (T´oth 1996) on the VIC cluster of the KU Leuven. The initial condition consists out of a helmet streamer embeddedin a bi-modal solar wind. To obtain a magnetic field configuration thatresembles the breakout model (Antiochos et al. 1999), at the solar surface, symmetrically with respect the solar equator, we added an extra magnetic field with an orientation that is anti-parallel with respect to the orientation of the overlying field. In order to build up magnetic freeenergy into the system, we applied both magnetic shearing motions alongthe polarity inversion line and magnetic flux emergence from below the photosphere. Since the initial steady state, the numerical grid, the numerical method and all the boundary conditions, except for the azimuthal component of the vector potential and of the velocity, are the same for both types of driving, this allowed us to objectively compare the two driving mechanisms. We found that the overall evolution of the system is very similar when the two driving mechanisms are applied. As a consequence of the applied boundary conditions, the magnetic pressure insidethe central arcade increases and the arcade starts to expand, eventually compressing the X-point and forming a current sheet. At a certain moment magnetic reconnection sets in, transferring flux from the overlying field toward the side arcades eventually detaching the helmet streamer and resulting in a slow blowout CME. We found that when shearing motions are present also flare reconnection at the flanks of the central arcade is observed, while this is absent when flux emergence is at work. We alsofound that the injection of magnetic helicity is not a condicio sine qua non for the eruption to occur. However, when helicity is injected intothe system a threshold has been found. This seems to confirm the hypothesis that magnetic helicity may be a lower boundary for the magnetic free energy: helicity injection results in an increase of the magnetic freeenergy, eventually leading to a non-equilibrium process. These results pointed out the relevance of the role that the global magnetic field and the solar wind play in the CME initiation and propagation. In Chap. 4, following the combined observational and theoretical approach that has been the driver of these four years of research, we investigated the dynamics of the 2009 September 21 event. This slow CME, associated with a prominence eruption, underwent a strong latitudinal deflection during its propagation within the first four solar radii. We used stereoscopic images provided by the twin NASA Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft in order to reconstruct the three-dimensional trajectory of the CME bothwith the ExtremeUltraViolet Imager (EUVI) and COR1 coronagraph. The prominence left the Sun at a projected latitude of 37◦ S and entered the COR1 field-of-view (FOV) ata projected latitude of about 25◦ S, where it underwent a furtherdeflection toward the heliospheric current sheet (HCS), eventually reaching it. During its further propagation the CME longitude did not change more than 10◦, propagating almost along a meridional plane.In order to reproduce the observed dynamics, we performed an axisymmetric MHD simulation, starting from a magnetic field configuration that closely resembled the PFSS extrapolation for 2009 September 19.We applied localized shearing motions that mimicked the observed ones and introduced an amount of magnetic helicity comparable to the one measured for the active region (AR). As a consequence of the magnetic pressure imbalance due to the interchange reconnection that occurred in the null point inside the pseudostreamer, during its outward propagation, the CME was rapidly deflected toward the equator. The simulation reasonably well reproduced the observed dynamic s eventually fitting the observed height-time and latitude-time evolution of the observed CME. We also increased the strength of the global magnetic field and as a result the CME deflection toward the solar equator was more abrupt. We concluded that during solar minima, even CMEs originating from high latitudes can be easily deflected toward the HCS, eventually resulting in geo-effective events. How rapidly they are deflected depends on the strength of both the overlying magnetic field and the flux rope magnetic flux.Chapter 5was devoted to an observational analysis of the magnetic helicity flux in ARs that gave rise to either halo CMEs or failed eruptions. We analyzed ten ARs that gave rise to twelve halo CMEs and we measured the helicity injection rates, the helicity accumulations and the magnetic fluxes in order to investigate whether a relation between magnetic helicity fluxand CME initiation could be identified. We found that no unique behavior was observed. The major magnetic helicity injection has been observed during flux emergence events, however, for at least two cases the helicity injection was the consequence of photospheric shearing motions. In fact, no flux emergence/cancellation has been observed for those ARs. We also found that impulsive CMEs seem to not follow the hemispheric helicity rule, while this is the case for gradual CMEs. However, our sample wasvery limited and further investigation is needed to firmly validate this hypothesis. For a significant amount of ARs an abrupt change in the helicity injection rate was correlated with the CMEs occurence. We argued that this helicity injection could be the consequence of the magnetic torque imbalance between the coronal and the sub-photospheric part of the flux tube. In order to further investigate this phenomenon, we analyzed a failed eruption. From the Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE) images we inferred the helicity variation during the event and we compared it with the helicity injection measured from theMichelson Doppler Imager (MDI) magnetograms. We found that the helicity injection was of the opposite sign with respect to the model prediction. However, if the AR as a whole is considered and if we assume that during reconnection events helicity is transferred from one flux system to the other, the helicity injection predicted by the model is consistent with our measurements. Next, we investigated the role of shearing motions in the2010 April 3 filament eruption that resulted in the first geo-effectiveCME of solar cycle 24. We observed persistent shearing flows parallel to the polarity inversion line, that resulted in the reduction of the inclination between the axial field of the filament and the overlying field, eventually reducing the efficiency of the reconnection between these two field distributions. However, the filament underwent an eruption. We calculated the index for the torus instability and we found that at the moment of the eruption the system was torus unstable. Therefore, we concluded that the observed shearing motions may have resulted in the increase of the axial flux of the filament and as a consequence in the increase of its magnetic pressure. This increase in the magnetic pressure lifted up the flux rope slowly, eventually bringing its axis to a height where the condition for the torus instability is satisfied, resulting in thefilament eruption.The last chapter of the present thesis has been devoted to the development of a three-dimensional, data-inspired, non-zero plasma-beta MHD model for the initiation of CMEs. We presented a method to reconstruct the magnetic field starting from a solar magnetogram and under the assumption of force-free equilibrium. We superposed thesolution to an hydrostatic equilibrium and used the MPI-AMRVAC code (Keppens et al. 2012) to advance the MHD equations in time. We applied the method to the AR NOAA 9415 that during its transit across the solar diskgave rise to several CMEs and flares. Magnetic free energy has been introduced into the system by applying vortex motions along iso-contours ofthe vertical magnetic field distribution. The resulting magnetic configuration had the same chirality as the AR 9415. We then applied convergence motions toward the polarity inversion line that resembled the motionsobserved for the AR. As a result of the magnetic reconnection between the highly sheared magnetic field lines a flux rope is formed. While the reconnection continues more and more flux is transferred to the flux rope, eventually increasing the magnetic pressure inside it and driving theeruption. The obtained CME has a velocity of about 550 km/s and presents a typical three-part structure. We also found that even though the CMEpropagates in a medium where the plasma-beta is larger than one, due to the higher magnetic field, the plasma-beta is ∼ 0.1 withinthe flux rope. This transition of the plasma- is often observed in magnetic clouds.Concluding, the present thesis summarizes our efforts to develop a bilateral, observational and numerical, approach to uncover the physics that governs the dynamics of CMEs. The final goal of this challenging as well as fascinating research path will eventually allowus to provide valuable and reliable space weather forecasts.
机译:太阳耀斑和日冕物质抛射(CME)是磁性主导的现象,这一点已被广泛接受。在各种能源中,只有磁性能解决这种剧烈现象的能源需求。人们也普遍认为,驱动太阳爆发所必需的磁能应存储在电流中,这会导致非势磁场的配置。然而,目前尚不清楚这种能量如何在电晕中累积以及在何种条件下突然释放。因此,为了更好地了解这些太阳爆发的动力学,需要进行观测和理论研究的共同努力。在这个博士项目中,我们将太阳图像的数据分析与高级数学模型相结合,以增进我们对这种暴力现象的认识,这些暴力现象是造成空间天气的主要因素。从van der Holst等人的研究结果开始。 (2007年),我们研究了不同的驱动机制作为时间依赖的边界条件应用时,太阳日冕的响应。我们在鲁汶大学的VIC集群上使用通用对流编码(VAC)(托特1996年)进行了轴对称数值磁流体动力学(MHD)模拟。初始条件包括嵌入双峰太阳风中的头盔彩带。为了获得类似于突破模型的磁场配置(Antiochos et al。1999),在太阳表面相对于太阳赤道对称的情况下,我们添加了一个额外的磁场,该磁场相对于太阳的方向呈反平行。上覆的领域。为了在系统中建立磁自由能,我们应用了沿着极性反转线的磁剪切运动和从光球下方出现的磁通量。由于初始稳态,数值网格,数值方法和所有边界条件(矢量势和速度的方位角分量除外)对于两种类型的驱动都是相同的,因此我们可以客观地比较两者驱动机制。我们发现,当应用两种驱动机制时,系统的整体发展非常相似。由于施加了边界条件,中央拱廊内部的磁压力增加,拱廊开始膨胀,最终压缩X点并形成电流板。在某个时刻,磁性重新连接开始,将磁通从上覆磁场传递到侧拱廊,最终使头盔拖缆脱离,并导致CME缓慢爆裂。我们发现,当出现剪切运动时,在中央拱廊的侧面也观察到了喇叭口重新连接,而在出现通量的情况下则没有。我们还发现,磁螺旋的注入不是喷发发生的必要条件。但是,当将螺旋线注入系统时,已找到阈值。这似乎证实了以下假设:磁螺旋可能是磁自由能的下限:螺旋注入会导致磁自由能增加,最终导致不平衡过程。这些结果指出了整体磁场和太阳风在CME引发和传播中的作用的相关性。在第一章。参照图4,我们采用了观察和理论相结合的方法,这是这四年研究的驱动力,我们调查了2009年9月21日事件的动态。这种缓慢的CME与突出的喷发有关,在其在前四个太阳半径内传播期间经历了强烈的纬向偏转。我们使用了由美国国家航空航天局双太阳地球观测台(STEREO)航天器提供的立体图像,以便利用ExtremeUltraViolet Imager(EUVI)和COR1日冕仪重建CME的三维轨迹。突出部分以37ºS的预计纬度离开太阳,进入COR1视场(FOV)ata预测的纬度为25ºS,然后向日球电流表(HCS)进一步偏转,最终到达它。在其进一步传播期间,CME经度变化不超过10o,几乎在子午面上传播。为了重现观察到的动力学,我们从与PFSS外推法非常相似的磁场结构开始,进行了轴对称MHD模拟。 2009年9月19日,我们采用了局部剪切运动,该运动模仿了观察到的剪切运动,并引入了与活性区域(AR)相同的磁螺旋强度。由于伪拖缆在向外传播期间在零点内发生的交换重新连接而导致的磁压力不平衡,CME迅速偏向赤道。该模拟合理地很好地再现了观测到的动力学,最终拟合了观测到的CME的观测到的高度时间和纬度时间演化。我们还增加了整体磁场的强度,结果,CME向太阳赤道的偏转更加突然。我们得出的结论是,在太阳极小时期,即使是来自高纬度的CME也可以很容易地偏向HCS,最终导致发生地球有效事件。它们偏转的速度取决于上覆磁场和磁通绳磁通量的强度。第五章专门研究了AR中引起螺旋状CME或喷发失败的磁螺旋通量的观测分析。我们分析了十个AR,产生了十二个CME,并测量了螺旋注入速率,螺旋积累和磁通量,以研究磁螺旋通量与CME引发之间的关系。我们发现没有观察到独特的行为。在通量出现过程中观察到了主要的磁螺旋注入,但是,至少在两种情况下,螺旋注入是光球剪切运动的结果。实际上,对于这些AR,没有观察到通量的出现/消除。我们还发现,脉冲式CME似乎不遵循半球螺旋度规则,而渐进式CME就是这种情况。但是,我们的样本非常有限,需要进一步研究以坚定地验证这一假设。对于大量的AR,螺旋注射速率的突然变化与CME的发生相关。我们认为这种螺旋性注入可能是通量管的冠状部分和亚光子部分之间的磁转矩不平衡的结果。为了进一步调查这种现象,我们分析了一次失败的喷发。从过渡区和日冕总管(TRACE)图像中,我们推断出事件期间的螺旋度变化,并将其与根据米歇尔森多普勒成像仪(MDI)磁图测量的螺旋度注入进行了比较。我们发现,相对于模型预测,螺旋注入是相反的符号。但是,如果从整体上考虑AR,并且我们假设在重新连接事件期间将螺旋度从一个通量系统转移到另一个通量系统,则模型预测的螺旋度注入与我们的测量结果一致。接下来,我们研究了剪切运动在2010年4月3日长丝喷发中的作用,该活动导致了太阳周期24的第一个地球有效CME。我们观察到平行于极性反转线的持续剪切流,这导致了两极之间的倾角减小。灯丝的轴向场和上场,最终降低了这两个场分布之间重新连接的效率。但是,细丝发生了喷发。我们计算了圆环不稳定性的指数,并且发现在喷发时系统是圆环不稳定的。因此,我们得出结论,观察到的剪切运动可能导致细丝的轴向通量增加,并因此导致其磁压力增加。磁压力的这种增加缓慢地使通量绳提起,最终使其轴线达到满足环面不稳定性条件的高度,从而导致了细丝的喷发。本论文的最后一章专门研究了磁链的发展。三维,基于数据的非零血浆β-MHD模型用于发起C​​ME。我们提出了一种从太阳磁图开始并在无力平衡的假设下重建磁场的方法。我们将解决方案叠加到静水平衡上,并使用MPI-AMRVAC代码(Keppens等人,2012年)来及时扩展MHD方程。我们将该方法应用于AR NOAA 9415,该方法在其穿过太阳磁盘的过程中上升到多个CME和耀斑。通过沿垂直磁场分布的等值线施加涡旋运动,将磁自由能引入系统。所得的磁性结构具有与AR 9415相同的手性。然后,我们向与AR观察到的运动类似的极性反转线施加了收敛运动。由于高剪切磁场线之间的磁性重新连接,形成了磁通绳。在重新连接继续进行的过程中,越来越多的磁通量被传输到磁通量绳,最终增加了其内部的磁压并推动了喷发。所获得的CME的速度约为550 km / s,具有典型的三部分结构。我们还发现,即使CME在血浆β大于1的介质中传播,由于磁场较高,,通量绳内的血浆β值为〜0.1。等离子体的这种转变通常在磁云中观察到。最后,本论文总结了我们为研究控制CME动力学的物理学的双边,观测和数值方法所做的努力。这一具有挑战性以及引人入胜的研究道路的最终目标将最终使我们能够提供有价值且可靠的太空天气预报。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zuccarello Francesco;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号