首页> 外文OA文献 >Plant-Based Meat Substitutes in the Flexitarian Age: An Audit of Products on Supermarket Shelves
【2h】

Plant-Based Meat Substitutes in the Flexitarian Age: An Audit of Products on Supermarket Shelves

机译:植物的肉类替代品在灵活性年龄:超市货架上的产品审核

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Demand for plant-based meat substitutes is growing globally for nutritional and environmental reasons, with Australia the third-fastest growing vegan market worldwide. This study aimed to profile and compare plant-based meat substitutes (mimicking meat) with equivalent meat products, and 2015 data. An audit undertaken in May (updated in September 2019) from four metropolitan Sydney supermarkets (Coles, Woolworths, Aldi, IGA), collected nutrition information and Health Star Rating (HSR) from 137 products (50 burgers, 10 mince, 29 sausages, 24 chicken, 9 seafood, 15 other). Mean (± standard deviation (SD)) and median (range) was calculated for nutrients and HSR. Plant-based options were generally lower in kilojoules, total and saturated fat, higher in carbohydrate, sugars, and dietary fibre compared with meat. Only 4% of products were low in sodium (58−1200 mg/100 g). Less than a quarter of products (24%) were fortified with vitamin B12, 20% with iron, and 18% with zinc. HSR featured on 46% (3.6−4.4 stars). On-pack claims were vegetarian/vegan/plant-based (80%), protein (63%), non-genetically modified/organic (34%), gluten free (28%). Product numbers increased five-fold (↑429%) in four years. The plant protein trend has prompted innovation in meat substitutes, however wide nutrient ranges and higher sodium levels highlights the importance of nutrition guidelines in their development to ensure equivalence with animal-based proteins.
机译:对于营养和环境原因,对植物的肉类替代品的需求正在全球范围内增长,澳大利亚是全球第三最快的素食市场。本研究旨在简介并比较植物的肉类替代品(模仿肉),并使用同等肉类产品和2015年数据进行比较。 5月份(2019年9月更新的审计)来自四个大都会悉尼超市(Coles,Woolworths,Aldi,Iga),收集的营养信息和HSR)从137件产品(50汉堡,10粒,29个香肠,24鸡,9海鲜,15别)。为营养素和HSR计算平均值(±标准偏差(SD))和中值(范围)。与肉相比,基于植物的选择通常以千焦耳,总和饱和脂肪,碳水化合物,糖和膳食纤维更高。只有4%的产物在钠中低(58-1200mg / 100g)。少于四分之一的产品(24%)与维生素B12,20%用铁,18%与锌加强。 HSR符合46%(3.6-4.4星)。在包装索赔中是素食主义者/素食/植物(80%),蛋白质(63%),非转基因/有机(34%),无麸质(28%)。产品编号在四年内增加五倍(↑229%)。植物蛋白质趋势促使肉类替代品的创新,但营养范围和更高的钠水平突出了营养准则在其发展中的重要性,以确保与基于动物的蛋白质等效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号