首页> 外文OA文献 >Ramucirumab Safety in East Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Six Global, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Clinical Trials
【2h】

Ramucirumab Safety in East Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Six Global, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Clinical Trials

机译:Ramucirumab安全在东亚患者中:六个全球,随机,双盲,安慰剂控制,III期临床试验的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: Several ramucirumab trials have reported a higher incidence of selected adverse events (AEs) in East Asian (EA) patients with cancer versus non-EA patients. A meta-analysis was conducted across six completed phase III trials to establish the safety parameters of ramucirumab in EA compared with non-EA patients. Materials and Methods: Six global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III registration trials investigating ramucirumab were assessed. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated for selected all-grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs using fixed-effects and mixed-effects models. Ratio of RR and number needed to harm were calculated for AEs (all grade and grade ≥ 3) between EA and non-EA patients. Results: Of 4,996 randomly assigned patients receiving ramucirumab or placebo, 802 (16.1%) were EA (ramucirumab, n = 411; placebo, n = 391) and 4,194 were non-EA (ramucirumab, n = 2,337; placebo, n = 1,857). Patient baseline characteristics were generally balanced between treatment arms in EA and non-EA patients, excluding sex and body weight. Grade ≥ 3 AEs possibly associated with ramucirumab, which were increased in EA versus non-EA patients, included neutropenia (42.1% v 25.5%, respectively) and proteinuria (3.9% v 0.6%, respectively). There was an increase in the RR of several grade ≥ 3 AEs, including hypertension and proteinuria, in ramucirumab-treated EA and non-EA patients compared with placebo. The ratio of RR revealed no significant differences between EA and non-EA patients for all-grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Conclusion: Despite the enhanced propensity of selected AEs in EA patients relative to non-EA patients, there were no substantial differences in the RR for AEs possibly associated with ramucirumab in these phase III trials.
机译:目的:几种Ramucirumab试验报告了东亚(EA)癌症与非EA患者患者的选定不良事件(AES)发病率更高。在六种完成的阶段III试验中进行了META分析,以确定与非EA患者相比EA中RAMUCIRUMAB的安全参数。材料和方法:评估六种全球,随机,双盲,安慰剂控制,调查Ramucirumab的III期登记试验。使用固定效应和混合效果模型计算出选择的全级和≥3AES的相对风险(RRS)和95%CI。 EA和非EA患者之间的AES(全产阶级和≥3)计算危害所需的RR和数量的比率。结果:4,996例随机分配接受Ramucirumab或安慰剂的患者,802(16.1%)是EA(Ramucirumab,N = 411;安慰剂,n = 391)和4,194是非ea(Ramucirumab,n = 2,337;安慰剂,n = 1,857 )。患者基线特征通常在EA和非EA患者的治疗臂之间平衡,不包括性别和体重。 ≥3α可能与RAMUCIRUMAB相关的≥3AES,其在EA与非EA患者中增加,包括中性粒细胞病(分别为42.1%v)和蛋白尿(分别为3.9%v 0.6%)。与安慰剂相比,在Ramucirumab治疗的EA和非EA患者中,几种≥3μE的RR增加了几级≥3α,包括高血压和蛋白尿。 RR的比例显示EA和非EA患者对所有级和≥3AES之间没有显着差异。结论:尽管在非EA患者中,尽管患有EA患者的选定AES的倾向增强,但在这些第III期试验中可能与RAMUCIRUMAB相关的AES没有大量差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号