首页> 外文OA文献 >Three Essays On Agricultural Futures Traders
【2h】

Three Essays On Agricultural Futures Traders

机译:关于农产品期货交易员的三篇论文

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a comprehensive study of the growth and impact of agricultural futures market traders. The growth of financial investment in commodities has introduced participants and raised both new questions and warranted revisiting old questions; these include the impact on commodity prices, the profitability of traders, and the existence of trading skill. To address these questions twelve commodity markets are chosen to capture the majority of agricultural trading on organized futures markets and encompass the agricultural commodity index trading activity. The data used are from the proprietary large trader database of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that details individual trader end of day positions and covers the years 2000 to 2009.The growth of index fund investment from $12 billion in 2002 to over $200 billion by 2008 initiated a debate on whether index funds are ???too big??? for the current size of commodity futures markets. Concerns emerged regarding their adverse effects on prices and volatility. The impact of the financial investment of index traders is analyzed using Granger Causality tests. The analysis investigates three different scenarios: (i) aggregated commodity index trader positions impacts on returns or volatility, (ii) changes in returns or volatility effects on aggregate commodity index trader positions, and (iii) disaggregated commodity index trader positions effects on contract returns or volatility during the roll period. Results show index traders do not have a widespread impact on returns or volatility and in some cases actually decrease volatility bringing stability to the marketplace. The futures markets have adjusted to the presence of the new financial participants and continue to provide price discovery and risk management. The results have important implications for the ongoing policy debate surrounding index investment; in particular, the results do not support limiting participation of index fund investors.The returns to traders are analyzed to determine if a risk premium in agricultural futures markets exists, where hedgers pay speculators for protection against adverse price movements. The existence of a risk premium is often touted as a motivation factor for speculative trading. The long, passive index traders that emerged as major participants in 2004 and 2005 provide a natural experiment to determine if na??vely holding positions opposite of hedgers results in positive profits and thereby evidence of a risk premium. Even in the presence of increased prices and volatility that encourage the transfer of risk, no risk premium is found. CITs do not display evidence of receiving a risk premium by earning consistent positive returns but rather experience large losses in aggregate whereas noncommercial traders experience positive profits. The absence of a risk premium may occur because an infinitely elastic supply of speculative services results in the risk premium being bid to zero or the risk absorbing role is usurped by liquidity demands of index traders.Finally, speculative, noncommercial traders are analyzed to determine if they persist in making profits or if profits are randomly generated. The study focuses on three important and representative commodities; corn for field crops, live cattle for livestock, and coffee for soft commodities. Two methods are used to analyze the persistent ability of traders to generate positive outcomes: (i) the first is the Fisher Exact test, a nonparametric two-way winner and loser rank contingency table analysis, and (ii) the second is the testing of trader by magnitude of profits using the rank of trader profits in the first period to identify top and bottom deciles. The results indicate that the top 10% of traders have substantial ability to persistently perform; this is about 5-8% more traders than identified in other studies of agricultural futures traders. The rigorous out-of-sample procedures used in this essay provide compelling evidence of the importance of skill in trader returns, and may help explain their continued presence in futures markets in the absence of a risk premium.
机译:这是对农业期货市场交易者的成长和影响的综合研究。对商品的金融投资的增长已经引入了参与者,并提出了新的问题,并有必要重新讨论旧的问题;其中包括对商品价格的影响,交易者的获利能力以及交易技巧的存在。为了解决这些问题,选择了十二种商品市场来捕获有组织期货市场上的大部分农业交易,并且涵盖了农产品指数交易活动。所使用的数据来自商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)的专有大型交易者数据库,该数据库详细列出了单个交易者的日末头寸,涵盖2000年至2009年。指数基金投资从2002年的120亿美元增长到超过2000亿美元到2008年,就指数基金是否过大展开了辩论。针对当前商品期货市场的规模。人们担心它们对价格和波动性的不利影响。使用格兰杰因果关系检验分析了指数交易者的金融投资的影响。该分析调查了三种不同的情况:(i)商品指数交易者持仓总量对收益或波动率的影响;(ii)收益率或波动率变化对商品指数交易者总持仓量的影响;(iii)商品指数交易者持仓的分解对合约收益率的影响或滚动期间的波动性。结果表明,指数交易商并未对回报或波动产生广泛的影响,并且在某些情况下实际上降低了波动,从而为市场带来了稳定性。期货市场已经适应新的金融参与者的存在,并继续提供价格发现和风险管理。结果对围绕指数投资的持续政策辩论具有重要意义;尤其是,该结果并不支持限制指数基金投资者的参与。分析交易者的收益,以确定在农产品期货市场中是否存在风险溢价,在该市场中套期保值者向投机者支付费用以防止不利的价格波动。风险溢价的存在经常被吹捧为投机交易的动机因素。在2004年和2005年成为主要参与者的长期被动指数交易商提供了一个自然的实验,可以确定幼稚地持有与对冲者相对的头寸是否会带来正利润,从而证明存在风险溢价。即使存在鼓励风险转移的价格上涨和波动性,也没有发现风险溢价。 CIT并没有显示出通过获得一致的正收益而获得风险溢价的证据,而是遭受了总计较大的损失,而非商业交易者则经历了正利润。风险溢价的缺失可能是由于投机服务的无限弹性供应导致风险溢价竞标为零或指数交易者的流动性需求篡夺了风险吸收作用。最后,对投机性,非商业交易者进行分析以确定是否他们坚持赚钱,或者如果利润是随机产生的。该研究着重于三种重要且具有代表性的商品;玉米用于大田作物,牲畜用于牲畜,咖啡用于软商品。两种方法用于分析交易者产生积极结果的持久能力:(i)第一种是Fisher精确检验,非参数双向获胜者和失败者排名列联表分析,以及(ii)第二种是对交易者按获利幅度使用第一时期交易者获利排名确定最高和最低位。结果表明,排名前10%的交易者具有持续执行的实质能力;这比其他农业期货交易者研究中确定的交易者大约多5-8%。本文中使用的严格的样本外程序可提供令人信服的证据,证明技能对交易者收益的重要性,并可能有助于解释在没有风险溢价的情况下其在期货市场中的持续存在。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aulerich Nicole M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号