首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy >Who Wins and Who Loses? Trader Returns and Risk Premiums in Agricultural Futures Markets
【24h】

Who Wins and Who Loses? Trader Returns and Risk Premiums in Agricultural Futures Markets

机译:谁赢了,谁失去了? 交易员在农业期货市场返回和风险保费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rise of commodity index traders (CITs) in the early 2000s provides a natural experiment to identify whether passive holding of long agricultural futures positions earns a positive risk premium. We use nearly a decade of daily nonpublic position data for all large traders to compute trading profits in twelve agricultural futures markets. Despite increasing price trends in a majority of markets, CITs were the biggest losers during the sample period, experiencing losses in nine out of twelve markets and an aggregate loss of $6.9 billion. This is just the opposite of the prediction of the theory of normal backwardation.
机译:20世纪90年代初商品指数交易员(CITS)的兴起提供了一种自然的实验,以确定长农产品期货职位的被动持有是否获得积极的风险溢价。 我们使用近十年的每日非公共位置数据,所有大型交易员都在十二个农业期货市场计算交易盈利。 尽管大多数市场的价格趋势提高了价格趋势,但CITS是在样品期间最大的输家,在十二个市场中九分之一的亏损和69亿美元的总损失。 这只是对正常后向理论的预测相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号