首页> 外文期刊>Science education >Scholarly Holds Lead Over Popular and Instructional: Text Type Influences Epistemological Reading Outcomes
【24h】

Scholarly Holds Lead Over Popular and Instructional: Text Type Influences Epistemological Reading Outcomes

机译:学者主导流行和教学:文本类型影响认识论的阅读结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Scholarly scientific literature conveys epistemological assumptions scientists operate on. Popular scientific literature and instructional science texts deviate in their portrayal of science from these epistemological assumptions. Thus, scholarly scientific literature holds more potential for improving students’ epistemological understanding of science. In an experimental study, we had 78 high school students read an original report from a scholarly scientific journal, a version of the same research article modified for low-knowledge readers, a popular scientific article, or a chapter from a science textbook. Students who had read the research article or the modified research article improved significantly strongest in their understanding of the constructive nature of science and the argumentative nature of science. We conclude that scholarly scientific literature produces more beneficial epistemological reading outcomes than popular scientific literature and instructional science texts. Therefore, science teachers should be encouraged to incorporate scholarly scientific literature in classroom reading activities.
机译:学术学术文献传达了科学家所依据的认识论假设。大众科学文献和教学科学课本对科学的描述与这些认识论假设背道而驰。因此,学术性科学文献在提高学生对科学的认识论理解上具有更大的潜力。在一项实验研究中,我们让78名高中生阅读了学术科学期刊的原始报告,针对低知识读者修改的同一研究文章的版本,热门科学文章或科学教科书中的一章。读过研究文章或经过修改的研究文章的学生,在对科学的建构性和论证性的理解上,进步最大。我们得出的结论是,与大众科学文献和教学科学课本相比,学术科学文献所产生的认识论阅读成果更为有益。因此,应鼓励理科教师将学术性科学文献纳入课堂阅读活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号