...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: A randomized controlled trial

机译:子宫颈旁阻滞用于控制妊娠早期流产的疼痛:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: Despite lack of efficacy data, the majority of first-trimester surgical abortions are performed with a paracervical block. Women may be unnecessarily exposed to a painful injection and potentially noxious medication. Our objective was to estimate the effect of a paracervical block and the effect of gestational age on patient pain perception. METHODS:: This was a randomized, single-blind trial of patients undergoing abortion receiving paracervical block or sham stratified by gestational age (early: less than 8 weeks of gestation, n=60; late: 8-10 6/7 weeks of gestation, n=60). Premedicated with ibuprofen and lorazepam, all participants received 2 mL 1% buffered lidocaine injected at the tenaculum site followed by a slow, deep injection of 18 mL at four sites (block) or no injection (sham) with a 3-minute wait. The primary outcome was dilation pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included pain at additional time points, satisfaction, need for more analgesics, and adverse events. RESULTS:: Full enrollment occurred (n=120). We used intent-to-treat analysis. Demographics did not differ between groups. Paracervical block administration was painful (mean 55 mm compared with sham 30 mm, P<.001) but decreased dilation pain (42 mm compared with 79 mm, P<.001) and aspiration pain (63mm compared with 89 mm, P<.001). These results were consistent for both gestational age strata; however, paracervical block benefit was greater at an earlier gestation. Satisfaction scores with pain control and the procedure were significantly higher in the block group. CONCLUSION:: Although paracervical block is painful, it reduces first-trimester abortion pain regardless of gestational age, but the benefit on dilation pain was greater at earlier gestations.
机译:目的::尽管缺乏疗效数据,但大多数孕早期的手术流产是在宫颈旁进行的。妇女可能不必要地经历了痛苦的注射和可能有害的药物治疗。我们的目的是评估子宫颈旁阻滞的影响以及胎龄对患者疼痛知觉的影响。方法:这是一项随机,单盲试验,接受流产的患者按胎龄分层(子宫颈早孕:少于8周,n = 60;晚期:妊娠8-10 6/7周),接受宫颈旁阻滞或假手术,n = 60)。所有患者均接受布洛芬和劳拉西m的预药治疗,在触角部位注射2 mL 1%的利多卡因缓冲液,然后在四个部位(阻滞)缓慢,深层注射18 mL,或不注射(假),等待3分钟。主要结局为扩张性疼痛(100毫米视觉模拟评分)。次要结果包括在其他时间点的疼痛,满意度,需要更多的止痛药和不良事件。结果::完全注册发生(n = 120)。我们使用了意图治疗分析。人群之间的人口统计学没有差异。颈旁阻滞给药是痛苦的(平均55mm,假手术组为30mm,P <.001),但扩张疼痛(42mm,79mm,相比P <.001)和抽吸痛(63mm,89mm,P <.001)减少。 001)。这些结果对于两个胎龄层都是一致的。然而,在早孕时宫颈副阻滞的益处更大。在疼痛组和疼痛控制方面的满意度得分明显高于对照组。结论:尽管子宫颈旁阻滞是痛苦的,但无论胎龄如何,它都能减轻孕中期流产的痛苦,但在妊娠早期,扩张性疼痛的益处更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号