首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development-An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases
【24h】

Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development-An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases

机译:与景观发展有关的跨学科博士论文中知识的联合生产-不同研究阶段的演员角色和知识类型分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Transdisciplinarity as a new paradigm in research on societal, landscape and environmental change is characterised by the integration of scientific and non-academic knowledge for complex problem solving. Less information has been published on the specific challenges for implementing coproduction of knowledge in doctoral studies. Based on a structured ex-post reflection of PhD-students and their advisors and on the comparison of four transdisciplinary doctoral projects completed in the "Doctoral School Sustainable Development" at BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Austria, this article analyses what types of actors contributed what kind of knowledge in which research phase. The results indicate certain patterns which could form the basis for further research but also for the planning of transdisciplinary projects. Professional practice experts, for example, had a key role in structuring the problem and the selection of case study areas in early project phases. Strategic case actors had an essential role as gatekeepers to local case actors, whereas local case actors contributed mostly context-specific, phenomenological and experiential knowledge. Furthermore, we identified the following challenges of transdisciplinary doctoral projects: shared responsibilities, originality versus continuity as well as dependence on commitment and schedules of actors. Actor integration, however, provides opportunities and learning effects going far beyond a traditional doctoral project, due to social competences gained and knowledge accumulated by interacting with different groups inside and outside academia
机译:跨学科性是社会,景观和环境变化研究的一种新范式,其特征是将科学知识和非学术知识相结合以解决复杂的问题。关于在博士研究中实施知识的联合生产的具体挑战的信息很少。本文基于对博士研究生及其顾问的结构化事后反思,并根据奥地利维也纳大学自然资源与生命科学大学“可持续发展博士学院”中完成的四个跨学科博士项目的比较,对本文进行了分析。哪些类型的参与者在哪个研究阶段贡献了哪些知识。结果表明某些模式可以为进一步研究奠定基础,也可以为跨学科项目的规划奠定基础。例如,专业实践专家在项目早期阶段构造问题和选择案例研究领域中发挥了关键作用。战略案例参与者在充当本地案例参与者的守门人方面发挥着至关重要的作用,而本地案例参与者则主要贡献了特定于上下文的,现象学和经验知识。此外,我们确定了跨学科博士项目的以下挑战:分担责任,独创性与连续性以及对参与者的承诺和时间表的依赖。然而,演员的融合提供的机会和学习效果远远超出了传统的博士项目,这是由于通过与学术界内外不同群体的互动获得了社交能力和积累的知识,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号